Resume-aware faculty matching

Find professors who actually fit you

Upload your resume. Four AI agents analyze your background, rank the faculty who fit, inspect their recent research, and help you draft outreach — grounded in their actual work, not templates.

Free to startNo credit cardCancel anytime
Top matches Balanced preset
Dr. Sarah Chen
Stanford · Interpretability · NLP
91
Dr. Marcus Holloway
MIT · Robotics · RL
84
Dr. Aisha Okonkwo
CMU · Fairness · HCI
82
Nova · Professor Researcher · re-ranking top 20…
Scott Schaefer

Scott Schaefer

· _Department Chair_

University of Utah · Economics

Active 1995–2018

h-index27
Citations3.7k
Papers71
Funding
See your match with Scott Schaefer — sign in to PhdFit.Sign in

About

Scott Schaefer is the Dumke Family Presidential Endowed Chair in Honor of Katherine W. and E.R. Dumke, Jr., and serves as the Division Chair for the Division of Quantitative Analysis of Markets and Organizations (QAMO). His professional role involves leadership in the field of quantitative analysis, focusing on markets and organizational structures. The information provided emphasizes his academic and administrative positions, highlighting his contributions to the university's research and educational missions in these areas.

Research topics

  • Business
  • Economics
  • Law
  • Microeconomics
  • Political science

Selected publications

  • The Returns to Elite Degrees: The Case of American Lawyers

    Industrial and Labor Relations Review · 2018-05-29 · 17 citations

    articleSenior author

    The authors study the market for young attorneys. Using data from two surveys of attorneys who passed the bar exam in 2000, they find that attorneys who graduate from law schools ranked in the Top 10 nationally earn considerably more than those without such a qualification, even compared to attorneys who graduate from schools ranked 11–20. The premium to an elite education carries over to an attorney’s undergraduate institution as well, and the findings suggest that elite bachelor’s degrees and elite law degrees are close substitutes in terms of their relationships to salaries. The elite–law school premium is more robust to various methods for correcting for selection on ability than the widely studied premium to attending a selective undergraduate institution. The authors consider several reasons elite-school premiums may exist in this labor market.

  • "The Returns to Elite Degrees: The Case of American Lawyers." Working Paper, 2016

    eYLS (Yale Law School) · 2016-01-01 · 1 citations

    articleSenior author
  • Firm/Employee Matching

    Industrial and Labor Relations Review · 2015-09-18 · 31 citations

    articleSenior author

    The authors study the sources of match-specific value at large U.S. law firms by analyzing how graduates of law schools group into law firms. They measure the degree to which lawyers from certain schools concentrate within certain firms and then analyze how this agglomeration can be explained by “natural advantage’’ factors (such as geographic proximity) and by productive complementarities across graduates of a given school. Large law firms tend to hire from a select group of law schools, and individual offices within these firms are substantially more concentrated in terms of hires from particular schools. The degree of concentration is highly variable, as there is substantial variation in firms’ hiring strategies. Two main drivers of variation in law school concentration occur within law offices. First, geography drives a large amount of concentration, as most firms hire largely from local schools. Second, school-based networks (and possibly productive complementarities) appear to be important because partners’ law schools drive associates’ law school composition even when controlling for firm, school, and firm/school match characteristics and when instrumenting for partners’ law schools.

  • Roadside MBA: Back Road Lessons for Entrepreneurs, Executives and Small Business Owners

    Medical Entomology and Zoology · 2014-06-10 · 1 citations

    bookOpen accessSenior author
  • Firm/Employee Matching: An Industry Study of American Lawyers

    SSRN Electronic Journal · 2012-12-01 · 15 citations

    articleOpen accessSenior author

    We study the sources of match-specific value at large American law firms by analyzing how graduates of law schools group into law firms. We measure the degree to which lawyers from certain schools concentrate within firms and then analyze how this agglomeration can be explained by "natural advantage" factors (such as geographic proximity) and by productive spillovers across graduates of a given school. We show that large law firms tend to be concentrated with regard to the law schools they hire from and that individual offices within these firms are substantially more concentrated. The degree of concentration is highly variable, as there is substantial variation in firms' hiring strategies. There are two main drivers of variation in law school concentration within law offices. First, geography drives a large amount of concentration, as most firms hire largely from local schools. Second, we show that school-based networks (and possibly productive spillovers) are important because partners' law schools drive associates' law school composition even controlling for firm, school, and firm/school match characteristics and when we instrument for partners' law schools.

  • "Welcome to the Club: The Returns to an Elite Degree for American Lawyers." Working Paper, 2012

    eYLS (Yale Law School) · 2012-01-01 · 2 citations

    articleSenior author
  • Firm/Employee Matching: An Industry Study of American Lawyers

    National Bureau of Economic Research · 2012-12-01 · 23 citations

    reportOpen accessSenior author

    We study the sources of match-specific value at large American law firms by analyzing how graduates of law schools group into law firms. We measure the degree to which lawyers from certain schools concentrate within firms and then analyze how this agglomeration can be explained by "natural advantage" factors (such as geographic proximity) and by productive spillovers across graduates of a given school. We show that large law firms tend to be concentrated with regard to the law schools they hire from and that individual offices within these firms are substantially more concentrated. The degree of concentration is highly variable, as there is substantial variation in firms' hiring strategies. There are two main drivers of variation in law school concentration within law offices. First, geography drives a large amount of concentration, as most firms hire largely from local schools. Second, we show that school-based networks (and possibly productive spillovers) are important because partners' law schools drive associates' law school composition even controlling for firm, school, and firm/school match characteristics and when we instrument for partners' law schools.

  • Welcome to the Club: The Returns to an Elite Degree for American Lawyers

    RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · 2012-01-01 · 5 citations

    preprintSenior author

    Competition for seats in elite U.S. graduate school programs has intensified dramatically over the past 40 years. In this paper, we study the market for young attorneys to illuminate the role that elite graduate programs play in human capital development. We find that attorneys who graduate from law schools ranked in the top ten nationally earn considerably more than those without such a qualification, even compared to attorneys who graduate from schools ranked 11-20. The premium to an elite education carries over to an attorney's undergraduate institution as well, and we find that elite bachelors and elite law degrees appear to be close substitutes in terms of their effects on salaries. We compare our findings to the broader literature on the returns to attending a selective college, and find that the elite-law-school premium is more robust to various methods for correcting for selection on ability than the broader premium to attending a selective college. We discuss several potential reasons for why an elite school premium may exist in this labor market.

  • American BigLaw Lawyers and the Schools that Produce Them: A Profile and Rankings

    2011-01-01 · 4 citations

    articleSenior author

    We profile the lawyers that work at the largest 300 American law firms as of the Summer of 2008. We show how gender, years of experience, prestige of law school, and other qualities vary across lawyers of different rank and firms of different prestige. Geography is an important determinant of where lawyers work, with many going to undergraduate school and law school near where they ultimately practice. Geography is less important, however, at more prestigious firms and for graduates of higher ranked firms. We then go on to rank law firms based on the prestige of the law schools they attended and we rank law schools based on their success at placing lawyers at BigLaw firms. Chicago, Harvard, and Yale law schools are the clear leaders in placing graduates at BigLaw firms. We provide important caveats about these rankings.

  • Personnel Economics: Hiring and Incentives

    National Bureau of Economic Research · 2010-05-01 · 18 citations

    articleOpen accessSenior author

    We survey the Personnel Economics literature, focusing on how firms establish, maintain, and end employment relationships and on how firms provide incentives to employees. This literature has been very successful in generating models and empirical work about incentive systems. Some of the unanswered questions in this area --for example, the empirical relevance of the risk/incentive tradeoff and the question of whether CEO pay arrangements reflect competitive markets and efficient contracting -are likely to be very difficult to answer due to measurement problems. The literature has been less successful at explaining how firms can find the right employees in the first place. Economists understand the broad economic forces --matching with costly search and bilateral asymmetric information --that firms face in trying to hire. But the main models in this area treat firms as simple black-box production functions. Less work has been done to understand how different firms approach the hiring problem, what determines the firm-level heterogeneity in hiring strategies, and whether these patterns conform to theory. We survey some literature in this area and suggest areas for further research.

Frequent coauthors

  • Paul Oyer

    47 shared
  • Rachel M. Hayes

    9 shared
  • K. Glassmeier

    Technische Universität Braunschweig

    4 shared
  • Rachel Hayes

    Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development

    4 shared
  • A. Balogh

    Obuda University

    4 shared
  • Mark Shanley

    University of Illinois Chicago

    3 shared
  • Qiugang Zong

    Peking University

    3 shared
  • David Besanko

    Northwestern University

    3 shared

Awards & honors

  • Dumke Family Presidential Endowed Chair in Honor of Katherin…
  • Resume-aware match score
  • Save to shortlist
  • AI-drafted outreach

See your match with Scott Schaefer

PhdFit ranks faculty by your research interests, methods, and publications — grounded in their actual work, not templates.

  • Free to start
  • No credit card
  • 30-second signup