Roger Keresztes
· Associate Professor of MedicineStony Brook University · Hematology and Oncology
Active 1983–2024
About
Dr. Roger S Keresztes is a Clinical Associate Professor in Medicine at Stony Brook University. His professional focus includes hematology and oncology, with extensive research and clinical experience in the treatment of various cancers, including non-small-cell lung cancer, esophageal cancer, and gastroesophageal junction carcinoma. His work involves evaluating the efficacy and safety of novel therapeutic agents, such as apricoxib, bortezomib, celecoxib, and other antiangiogenic agents, often through phase II clinical trials. Dr. Keresztes completed his fellowship in Hematology/Oncology at New York-Presbyterian University Hospital of Columbia and Cornell in 1993, following his residency in Internal Medicine at the same institution in 1990. He earned his medical degree from the University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey in 1987. His research contributions include investigating the molecular basis of adverse events related to cancer treatments, assessing preoperative chemotherapy responses, and exploring the role of anti-inflammatory agents in cancer therapy. His work has been published in reputable journals such as the Journal of Clinical Oncology, Cancer Investigation, and the New England Journal of Medicine.
Research topics
- Medicine
- Internal medicine
- Oncology
- Surgery
- Immunology
Selected publications
Immuno-Oncology Technology · 2024-12-01 · 5 citations
articleOpen accessPrognostic factors for survival in NSCLC treated with immunotherapy: An institutional analysis.
Journal of Clinical Oncology · 2024-06-01
articlee20591 Background: Immune check point inhibitors (ICIs) are the cornerstone of treatment for patients with advanced NSCLC. However, not all patients benefit from ICIs and some develop significant immune-mediated toxicities. There is limited data regarding prognostic factors in NSCLC patients treated with ICIs. Imaging features can complement clinical variables in predicting response to ICIs. This study aims to evaluate CEA, blood leukocyte markers, and novel CT-derived radiomic features as factors predictive of survival in this patient population. Methods: In this retrospective study, clinical data from patients with advanced stage NSCLC treated with ICIs at Stony Brook University Hospital from 2016 to 2021 were collected. Baseline and subsequent CEA (carcinoembryonic antigen), ANC (absolute neutrophil count), ALC (absolute lymphocyte count), NLR (neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio), AEC (absolute eosinophil count), and AMC (absolute monocyte count) were evaluated as independent prognostic factors. 3-D segmentation of ipsilateral lung lobe was obtained using U-Net and radiologist report of tumor location. 600 stable IBSI-standardized features were extracted from the region using PyRadiomics. The discriminative ability of clinical and image-derived variables was assessed using Kaplan-Meier survival and Cox proportional hazards regression analysis. Results: This study included 80 patients. Objective response rate (ORR) was 25.0% with 1-year OS of 58.0%. PD-L1 expression ≥ 50% was significantly associated with survival (p < 0.02). Decrease in CEA (p < 0.01) and 5% increase in AEC (p = 0.027) significantly correlated with survival. Age, sex, clinical stage, ANC, ALC, NLR, AMC did not significantly predict survival. Three image biomarkers that correlated with median enhancement of tissue on chest CT, and degree of tissue heterogeneity were significant predictors of mortality (p < 0.02). A multivariable model with clinical inputs outperformed one with radiomic features only (C-index 0.70 vs. 0.64). Clinical and radiomic inputs together performed well in predicting survival (C-index 0.76). Conclusions: Changes in CEA and AEC were the strongest predictors of survival in advanced NSCLC patients treated with ICIs. This study suggests that combined clinical and radiomic biomarkers (quantifying local lobar heterogeneity) can identify patients most likely to benefit from immunotherapy. [Table: see text]
Journal of Clinical Oncology · 2024 · 103 citations
- Medicine
- Oncology
- Internal medicine
PURPOSE: The open-label, phase III EVOKE-01 study evaluated sacituzumab govitecan (SG) versus standard-of-care docetaxel in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC) with progression on/after platinum-based chemotherapy, anti-PD-(L)1, and targeted treatment for actionable genomic alterations (AGAs). Primary analysis is reported. METHODS: intravenous infusion on day 1) in 21-day cycles. Primary end point was overall survival (OS). Key secondary end points were investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate, patient-reported symptom assessment, and safety. RESULTS: = .0534), consistent across squamous and nonsquamous histologies. Median PFS was 4.1 versus 3.9 months (HR, 0.92 [95% CI, 0.77 to 1.11]). An OS benefit was observed for SG (n = 192) versus docetaxel (n = 191) in mNSCLC nonresponsive to last anti-PD-(L)1-containing regimen (3.5-month median OS increase; HR, 0.75 [95% CI, 0.58 to 0.97]); this was consistent across histologies. Among patients receiving SG and docetaxel, 6.8% and 14.2% discontinued because of treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs), respectively; 1.4% and 1.0%, respectively, had TRAEs leading to death. CONCLUSION: Although statistical significance was not met, OS numerically improved with SG versus docetaxel, which was consistent across histologies. Clinically meaningful improvement in OS was noted in mNSCLC nonresponsive to last anti-PD-(L)1-containing regimen. SG was better tolerated than docetaxel and consistent with its known safety profile, with no new safety signals.
Unilateral conjunctival Classic Kaposi Sarcoma following a COVID 19 booster
American Journal of Ophthalmology Case Reports · 2023-12-26 · 4 citations
articleOpen accessPurpose: We describe a case of Classic Kaposi's sarcoma in a functionally monocular patient following a COVID19 vaccine booster and provide compelling evidence that suggests the booster was a relevant co-factor in the initiation of the disease process. Observations: The patient presented with red, irritated conjunctival area described as "bubbling" in her right eye. While her past medical history includes hypercholesterolemia and hypertension, she had no history of a compromised immune system. Her ophthalmologic history is more complex including treatment for glaucoma. The patient has 20/20 uncorrected vision OD and LP OS. Due to her ocular co-morbidities, the patient initially received interferon alpha 2-B qid for 6 weeks. However, topical therapy failed to decrease the size of the conjunctival lesions. After referral to Radiation Oncology, the right eye/orbit was treated with electron beam therapy for 1 month which caused a marked decrease in the size and vascularity of the conjunctival lesions. A slow improvement continued during followup. Conclusion and importance: In that the vaccine booster preceded the cancer, it appears etiologic to the appearance of Kaposi's sarcoma. The patient's monocular vision and glaucoma complicated her treatment. This case expands on current concepts of cofactors needed for the development of Kaposi's sarcoma in that vaccine booster administration was relevant to tumor progression and both clinical and mechanistic evidence is presented to support this hypothesis.
Annals of Oncology · 2023 · 85 citations
- Medicine
- Internal medicine
- Oncology
JTO Clinical and Research Reports · 2021-03-24 · 8 citations
articleOpen accessINTRODUCTION: Glycoprotein NMB is a transmembrane protein linked with poor prognosis and is expressed in most squamous lung cancer. Glembatumumab vedotin is an antibody-drug conjugate targeting glycoprotein NMB, administered intravenously every 3 weeks in this phase 1 study to determine the safety, tolerability, and maximum tolerated dose in patients who had progressed on any number of previous therapies. RESULTS: A total of 13 patients were enrolled; adverse events (of any grade) including dyspnea, neutropenia, respiratory failure, anemia, increased aspartate transaminase/alanine transaminase, diarrhea, and hypophosphatemia were seen in 15% of patients. Grade 5 events included two cases of respiratory failure, either completely or partially attributed to cancer progression. The only other grade 5 event was "disease progression." The most common adverse events (23%) were decreased appetite, fatigue, rash, and weight loss.The median overall and progression-free survivals were 5.7 months (90% confidence interval: 2.5-16.8) and 2.5 months (90% confidence interval: 1.6-5.8) respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Glembatumumab vedotin exhibited no serious or unexpected toxicity in this heavily pretreated population, except those caused by disease progression. Modest anticancer activity was observed with a recommendation for a phase 2 dose of 1.9 mg/kg. This portion of the study was not undertaken owing to the company's decision to discontinue drug development.
Journal of Thoracic Oncology · 2021-03-01 · 1 citations
articleOpen accessClinics and Practice · 2020 · 7 citations
Senior authorCorresponding- Medicine
- Surgery
- Internal medicine
Nivolumab-induced immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is a rare process with few reported cases. We present a 67-year-old man with advanced non-small cell lung cancer who was hospitalized with severe thrombocytopenia. Physical exam was notable for petechiae across his chest and extremities as well as bullae in his oral cavity. The patient initially received high-dose glucocorticoids and intravenous immuno - globulin, but did not respond to treatment. He was then started on weekly rituximab and after three doses, there was complete resolution of his thrombocytopenia. Altogether, his presentation was an extreme case and rare side effect of immune checkpoint therapy, known as nivolumab-induced ITP. Diagnosis of nivolumab-induced ITP is challenging given the lack of specific testing and a wide differential diagnosis. There are few cases reporting severe ITP following nivolumab treatment. We highlight the importance of recognizing and treating this rare complication of immunotherapy.
Cancer Management and Research · 2020-08-01 · 4 citations
articleOpen accessSenior authorBACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to determine which factors predicted survival and to derive a risk prediction model for patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) receiving concurrent chemo-radiotherapy (cCRT). METHODS: This investigation included 149 patients with locally advanced NSCLC who were treated with cCRT at Stony Brook University Hospital between 2007 and 2015. A finite set of demographic, clinical, and treatment variables were evaluated as independent prognostic factors. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were generated, and log rank tests were used to evaluate difference in survival between groups. To derive a risk score for mortality, a machine learning approach was utilized. To maximize statistical power while examining replicability, the sample was split into discovery (n=99) and replication (n=50) subsamples. Elastic-net regression was used to identify a linear prediction model. Youden's index was used to identify appropriate cutoffs. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to examine mortality risk; model concordance and hazards ratios were reported. RESULTS: One-quarter of the patients survived for three years after initiation of cCRT. Prognostic factors for survival in the discovery group included age, sex, smoking status, albumin, histology, largest tumor size, number of nodal stations, stage, induction therapy, and radiation dose. The derived model had good risk predictive accuracy (C=0.70). Median survival time was shorter in the high-risk group (0.93 years) vs the low-risk group (2.40 years). Similar findings were noted in the replication sample with strong model accuracy (C=0.69) and median survival time of 0.93 years and 2.03 years for the high- and low-risk groups, respectively. CONCLUSION: This novel risk prediction model for overall survival in patients with stage III NSCLC highlights the importance of integrating patient, clinical, and treatment variables for accurately predicting outcomes. Clinicians can use this tool to make personalized treatment decisions for patients with locally advanced NSCLC treated with concurrent chemo-radiation.
DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · 2020-08-11
articleOpen accessSenior authorAmna Sher,1 Sowmini Medavaram,1 Barbara Nemesure,2 Sean Clouston,2 Roger Keresztes1 1Department of Medicine, Stony Brook University Hospital, Stony Brook, NY, USA; 2Department of Family, Population and Preventive Medicine, Stony Brook University Hospital, Stony Brook, NY, USACorrespondence: Amna Sher Email Amna.Sher@Stonybrookmedicine.eduBackground: The purpose of this study was to determine which factors predicted survival and to derive a risk prediction model for patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) receiving concurrent chemo-radiotherapy (cCRT).Methods: This investigation included 149 patients with locally advanced NSCLC who were treated with cCRT at Stony Brook University Hospital between 2007 and 2015. A finite set of demographic, clinical, and treatment variables were evaluated as independent prognostic factors. Kaplan&amp;ndash;Meier survival curves were generated, and log rank tests were used to evaluate difference in survival between groups. To derive a risk score for mortality, a machine learning approach was utilized. To maximize statistical power while examining replicability, the sample was split into discovery (n=99) and replication (n=50) subsamples. Elastic-net regression was used to identify a linear prediction model. Youden&amp;rsquo;s index was used to identify appropriate cutoffs. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to examine mortality risk; model concordance and hazards ratios were reported.Results: One-quarter of the patients survived for three years after initiation of cCRT. Prognostic factors for survival in the discovery group included age, sex, smoking status, albumin, histology, largest tumor size, number of nodal stations, stage, induction therapy, and radiation dose. The derived model had good risk predictive accuracy (C=0.70). Median survival time was shorter in the high-risk group (0.93 years) vs the low-risk group (2.40 years). Similar findings were noted in the replication sample with strong model accuracy (C=0.69) and median survival time of 0.93 years and 2.03 years for the high- and low-risk groups, respectively.Conclusion: This novel risk prediction model for overall survival in patients with stage III NSCLC highlights the importance of integrating patient, clinical, and treatment variables for accurately predicting outcomes. Clinicians can use this tool to make personalized treatment decisions for patients with locally advanced NSCLC treated with concurrent chemo-radiation.Keywords: prediction model, survival, locally advanced, NSCLC
Recent grants
NIH · $27.7M · 2008
Frequent coauthors
- 169 shared
Richard A. Michaelson
- 169 shared
Michael C. Perry
- 169 shared
I. Craig Henderson
- 169 shared
Donald A. Berry
- 169 shared
Clifford A. Hudis
American Society of Clinical Oncology
- 169 shared
Jeffrey Kirshner
Northern Indiana Cancer Research Consortium
- 169 shared
Larry Norton
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
- 169 shared
Gini F. Fleming
- Resume-aware match score
- Save to shortlist
- AI-drafted outreach
See your match with Roger Keresztes
PhdFit ranks faculty by your research interests, methods, and publications — grounded in their actual work, not templates.
- Free to start
- No credit card
- 30-second signup