Resume-aware faculty matching

Find professors who actually fit you

Upload your resume. Four AI agents analyze your background, rank the faculty who fit, inspect their recent research, and help you draft outreach — grounded in their actual work, not templates.

Free to startNo credit cardCancel anytime
Top matches Balanced preset
Dr. Sarah Chen
Stanford · Interpretability · NLP
91
Dr. Marcus Holloway
MIT · Robotics · RL
84
Dr. Aisha Okonkwo
CMU · Fairness · HCI
82
Nova · Professor Researcher · re-ranking top 20…
Stephen Palumbi

Stephen Palumbi

Verified

Stanford University · Biology

Active 1980–2024

h-index131
Citations102.5k
Papers45983 last 5y
Funding$1.9M
See your match with Stephen Palumbi — sign in to PhdFit.Sign in

Research topics

  • Ecology
  • Biology
  • Environmental science
  • Computer Science
  • Philosophy
  • Epistemology
  • Mathematics
  • Geography
  • Environmental resource management
  • Evolutionary biology
  • Genetics
  • Computational biology
  • Fishery

Selected publications

  • Intended consequences statement

    Conservation Science and Practice · 2021 · 15 citations

    • Philosophy
    • Epistemology

    Source Agritrop Cirad (https://agritrop.cirad.fr/605797/)

  • Genomic analysis of distinct bleaching tolerances among cryptic coral species

    Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · 2021 · 60 citations

    Senior authorCorresponding
    • Biology
    • Evolutionary biology
    • Computational biology

    . Overall, resilience to bleaching during the third global bleaching event was strongly structured by host cryptic species, buoyed by differences in symbiont associations between these species.

  • Designing a blueprint for coral reef survival

    Biological Conservation · 2021 · 161 citations

    • Fishery
    • Environmental resource management
    • Geography

    Maintaining coral reef ecosystems is a social imperative, because so many people depend on coral reefs for food production, shoreline protection, and livelihoods. The survival of reefs this century, however, is threatened by the mounting effects of climate change. Climate mitigation is the foremost and essential action to prevent coral reef ecosystem collapse. Without it, reefs will become extremely diminished within the next 20–30 years. Even with strong climate mitigation, however, existing conservation measures such as marine protected areas and fisheries management are no longer sufficient to sustain the ecosystem and many additional and innovative actions to increase reef resilience must also be taken. In this paper we assess the suite of protections and actions in terms of their potential to be effective according to a set of criteria that include effectiveness, readiness, co-benefits and disbenefits. Even with the best scientific innovation, saving coral reefs will require a well-funded, well-designed, and rapidly executed strategy with political and social commitments at the level of other grand challenges.

  • Increasing comparability among coral bleaching experiments

    Ecological Applications · 2020 · 158 citations

    • Computer Science
    • Ecology
    • Environmental science

    Coral bleaching is the single largest global threat to coral reefs worldwide. Integrating the diverse body of work on coral bleaching is critical to understanding and combating this global problem. Yet investigating the drivers, patterns, and processes of coral bleaching poses a major challenge. A recent review of published experiments revealed a wide range of experimental variables used across studies. Such a wide range of approaches enhances discovery, but without full transparency in the experimental and analytical methods used, can also make comparisons among studies challenging. To increase comparability but not stifle innovation, we propose a common framework for coral bleaching experiments that includes consideration of coral provenance, experimental conditions, and husbandry. For example, reporting the number of genets used, collection site conditions, the experimental temperature offset(s) from the maximum monthly mean (MMM) of the collection site, experimental light conditions, flow, and the feeding regime will greatly facilitate comparability across studies. Similarly, quantifying common response variables of endosymbiont (Symbiodiniaceae) and holobiont phenotypes (i.e., color, chlorophyll, endosymbiont cell density, mortality, and skeletal growth) could further facilitate cross-study comparisons. While no single bleaching experiment can provide the data necessary to determine global coral responses of all corals to current and future ocean warming, linking studies through a common framework as outlined here, would help increase comparability among experiments, facilitate synthetic insights into the causes and underlying mechanisms of coral bleaching, and reveal unique bleaching responses among genets, species, and regions. Such a collaborative framework that fosters transparency in methods used would strengthen comparisons among studies that can help inform coral reef management and facilitate conservation strategies to mitigate coral bleaching worldwide.

Recent grants

Frequent coauthors

  • Jeremy B. C. Jackson

    78 shared
  • Fiorenza Micheli

    Stanford University

    77 shared
  • Melissa H. Pespeni

    University of Vermont

    60 shared
  • Carl Folke

    Stockholm University

    52 shared
  • Benjamin S. Halpern

    University of California, Santa Barbara

    51 shared
  • J. Emmett Duffy

    Smithsonian Environmental Research Center

    48 shared
  • Boris Worm

    Dalhousie University

    44 shared
  • Heike K. Lotze

    44 shared
  • Resume-aware match score
  • Save to shortlist
  • AI-drafted outreach

See your match with Stephen Palumbi

PhdFit ranks faculty by your research interests, methods, and publications — grounded in their actual work, not templates.

  • Free to start
  • No credit card
  • 30-second signup