
Lisa House
· Department Chair & ProfessorVerifiedUniversity of Florida · Food and Resource Economics
Active 1969–2026
About
Dr. Lisa House is a Professor and Department Chair in the Food and Resource Economics Department at the University of Florida. She also serves as Co-Director of the Florida Agricultural Market Research Center. Her teaching includes classes in agribusiness marketing and management, world agriculture, and survey research methods. She has served as both Undergraduate and Graduate Coordinator and was named the Advisor of the Year for CALS and UF in 2007-08. Dr. House has earned teaching awards from the Southern Agricultural Economics Association, the Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, and the College of Agricultural and Life Sciences at the University of Florida. Her research focuses on consumer behavior, particularly understanding the effects of consumer attitudes, tastes, and preferences on Florida agriculture. She and her colleagues conduct research related to consumer behavior and the challenges facing the agricultural industry in producing healthy food while predicting consumer reactions to changing technologies and information. This includes research on consumer acceptance of foods produced with biotechnology, trade-offs related to price, country of origin, and food attributes, as well as how consumers interpret information on food packaging to inform policy and business decisions. Dr. House also studies survey research methods to improve data collection techniques, relying heavily on data collected directly from consumers. She works closely with the Florida fruit and vegetable industry, especially the Florida Department of Citrus, to provide current insights into consumer preferences and attitudes towards Florida food products.
Research topics
- Economics
- Business
- Medicine
- Environmental health
- Psychology
- Advertising
- Political Science
- Biology
- Geography
- Marketing
- Socioeconomics
- Natural resource economics
- Fishery
- Chemistry
- Ecology
- Food science
- Economic growth
- Mathematics
- Microeconomics
Selected publications
How Consumer Demand for Orange Juice Changed: Price Elasticities by Process Type, 2022/23–2023/24
DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · 2026-05-01
articleOpen accessSenior authorThis study analyzes consumer responses to price changes in 100% orange juice during the 2022/23–2023/24 seasons. Using Nielsen sales data and a demand model, we estimate price elasticities for Not from Concentrate (NFC) and Reconstituted (Recon) juices. Both types showed elastic demand, with Recon being more price-sensitive. Cross-price elasticity estimates indicate that NFC and Recon are substitutes, but with asymmetric substitution: consumers are more likely to switch to Recon when NFC prices rise than vice versa. As the price gap between the two narrowed, consumers increasingly favored NFC over Recon. These findings highlight the importance of pricing in shaping demand and substitution behavior.
Nudging local: Do information treatments work?
Journal of the Agricultural and Applied Economics Association · 2025-07-17
articleOpen accessAbstract This study examines how information nudges shape consumer preferences for locally grown foods. Using an online discrete choice experiment with blueberries, we assess the effectiveness of tailored information emphasizing local economy support, quality, and environmental benefits in increasing consumer valuation of state‐branded products. Results indicate that consumers respond positively to all information treatments, with quality—particularly freshness—having the strongest effect. State ethnocentrism plays a key role, as consumers with higher state ethnocentrism exhibit greater willingness to pay for the state‐branded logo across all treatments. These findings provide insights for improving local food marketing strategies and strengthening state‐level marketing programs.
Journal of Marketing Analytics · 2025-03-17 · 1 citations
articleSenior authorApplied Economic Perspectives and Policy · 2025-08-09
articleOpen accessSenior authorABSTRACT The COVID‐19 pandemic compelled governments to implement various stringent measures, causing changes in food consumption patterns. In this study, we examine changes in consumer behaviors such as online grocery shopping and restaurant dine‐in/takeouts in the United States, Canada, France, the United Kingdom, South Korea, and Japan from 2021 to 2023 using multivariate probit regressions. The results reveal that food acquisition behaviors are shaped by a complex interplay of risk perceptions, socio‐demographic characteristics, and changing pandemic phases. Our study offers insights for food business marketing strategies and provides information for stakeholders in the international agribusiness industry through a multi‐country comparison.
Quality cue or price anchoring: The effect of price on consumer behavior in repeat experiments
Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d agroeconomie · 2025-01-26
articleSenior authorAbstract Price is one of the most important factors affecting consumer purchase decisions. Consumers may use price as a quality cue or reference point to make the decisions. However, few studies have considered the quality cue by controlling the price anchoring and vice versa. We conduct four identical experiments weeks apart to estimate the effect of price on consumers' product quality evaluation and WTP. The results show that (1) the price has a significant impact on appearance rating and taste rating; (2) product quality mediates the price effect on consumer WTP only if consumers have incomplete quality information about the product; and (3) the marginal effect of price on consumer WTP differs over time. The results of this study provide deep insights into the role of price on consumers' quality assessment and valuation formation of products.
The impacts of message framing on consumer preferences for gene editing
Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d agroeconomie · 2024-11-27 · 3 citations
articleAbstract Framing the same information in different ways can influence consumers’ decision making. This study assesses the impacts of information framing tools on consumer preference for a relatively novel food biotechnology tool – Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats (CRISPR). Using an online survey of U.S. orange juice consumers, we randomized consumers into a control and two treatment groups (gain vs. loss framing) and used a discrete choice experiment (DCE) to measure and compare consumers’ preferences across treatments. We find that both frames are effective in reducing the degree of aversion towards CRISPR, but the gain frame carries a stronger effect.
Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy · 2024-09-08
articleOpen accessAbstract This study examines the spillover effect of California's 2016 single‐use bag ban (SB 270) on unregulated single‐use plastics (SUPs) like cutlery, cups, and plates. We observed an insignificant 4.8% decrease in SUP sales over the entire post‐policy period, but a larger 8.1% drop in the second post‐year, which was only marginally significant. The findings suggest weak spillover effects from such environmental policies, indicating that direct regulations on certain environmentally harmful products might be more effective if jurisdictions aim to prohibit citizens from excessive use, rather than relying on the positive spillover effect from existing policies.
Author response for "An examination of US pet owners’ use of veterinary services, 2006–2018"
2024-01-12
peer-reviewAn examination of US pet owners’ use of veterinary services, 2006–2018
Veterinary Medicine and Science · 2024-03-27 · 13 citations
articleOpen accessCorrespondingOBJECTIVES: Examine US consumer pet-related and veterinary service expenditures and factors influencing US households' use of veterinary services. METHODS: Descriptive analysis on pet-related and veterinary service expenditures and regression analysis on pet owners' use of veterinary services, using data from the US Bureau of Labor Statistics Consumer Expenditure from 2006 to 2018, with the sample size of 257,836 households, of which 73,593 had pet expenses. RESULTS: From 1980 to 2018, the proportion of households with pet-related and veterinary service expenditures increased. Since 2010, the percentage of pet-owning households using veterinary services has increased substantially. Household characteristics were examined and significantly affected the probability of both pet and veterinary expenditures. Non-White and Hispanic groups had increased pet ownership, but the likelihood of veterinary service use has not surpassed White and non-Hispanic pet owners. CONCLUSIONS: Understanding the effects of household sociodemographics, particularly race and ethnicity, on using veterinary services provides insights for optimizing strategic planning for the pet industry and veterinarians. Reviewing the implications helps adjust and fine-tune strategies and influence the sustainability of the veterinary service sector by attracting different racial and ethnic groups. Future research might focus on other social and cultural factors influencing the utilization of veterinary care. The veterinary service sector can then effectively address pet care disparities, bridge existing gaps and improve economic viability.
Do color-coded Nutrition Facts Panels nudge the use of nutrition information?
Food Policy · 2024-10-11 · 4 citations
article
Frequent coauthors
- 83 shared
Zhifeng Gao
- 30 shared
Karla P. Shelnutt
- 24 shared
Anne Mathews
University of Florida
- 22 shared
Yan Heng
University of Florida
- 21 shared
Hyeyoung Kim
University of Alabama
- 15 shared
Michael S. Jones
University of Alaska Anchorage
- 15 shared
Allen F. Wysocki
University of Florida
- 15 shared
Yuan Jiang
Huazhong University of Science and Technology
Awards & honors
- UF Research Foundation Professorship (2017-2020)
- SAEA Lifetime Achievement Award (2021)
- AAEA Mentoring Award (2021)
- Advisor of the Year for CALS and UF (2007-08)
- Resume-aware match score
- Save to shortlist
- AI-drafted outreach
See your match with Lisa House
PhdFit ranks faculty by your research interests, methods, and publications — grounded in their actual work, not templates.
- Free to start
- No credit card
- 30-second signup