Resume-aware faculty matching

Find professors who actually fit you

Upload your resume. Four AI agents analyze your background, rank the faculty who fit, inspect their recent research, and help you draft outreach — grounded in their actual work, not templates.

Free to startNo credit cardCancel anytime
Top matches Balanced preset
Dr. Sarah Chen
Stanford · Interpretability · NLP
91
Dr. Marcus Holloway
MIT · Robotics · RL
84
Dr. Aisha Okonkwo
CMU · Fairness · HCI
82
Nova · Professor Researcher · re-ranking top 20…
Matthew J. Kotchen

Matthew J. Kotchen

Verified

Yale University · Environmental Health

Active 1997–2024

h-index44
Citations8.1k
Papers22158 last 5y
Funding
See your match with Matthew J. Kotchen — sign in to PhdFit.Sign in

Research topics

  • Computer Science
  • Business
  • Environmental science
  • Economics
  • Political Science
  • Public economics
  • Actuarial science
  • Law
  • Environmental planning
  • Risk analysis (engineering)
  • Biology
  • Epistemology
  • Neoclassical economics
  • Natural resource economics
  • Ecology
  • Environmental economics
  • Philosophy

Selected publications

  • Keep climate policy focused on the social cost of carbon

    Science · 2021 · 101 citations

    • Computer Science
    • Natural resource economics
    • Environmental science

    A proposed shift away from the SCC is ill advised

  • Cobenefits and Regulatory Impact Analysis: Theory and Evidence from Federal Air Quality Regulations

    Environmental and Energy Policy and the Economy · 2021 · 20 citations

    • Political Science
    • Computer Science
    • Environmental economics

    This article considers the treatment of cobenefits in benefit-cost analysis of federal air quality regulations. Using a comprehensive data set on all major Clean Air Act rules issued by the Environmental Protection Agency over the period 1997–2019, we show that (1) cobenefits make up a significant share of the monetized benefits; (2) among the categories of cobenefits, those associated with reductions in fine particulate matter are the most significant; and (3) cobenefits have been pivotal to the quantified net benefit calculation in nearly half of cases. Motivated by these trends, we develop a simple conceptual framework that illustrates a critical point: cobenefits are simply a semantic category of benefits that should be included in benefit-cost analyses. We also address common concerns about whether the inclusion of cobenefits is problematic because of alternative regulatory approaches that may be more cost-effective and the possibility for double counting.

  • Deep flaws in a mercury regulatory analysis

    Science · 2020 · 18 citations

    • Computer Science
    • Environmental planning
    • Environmental science

    The U.S. EPA ignores scientific evidence, economic best practice, and its own guidance

Frequent coauthors

  • Erin T. Mansur

    National Bureau of Economic Research

    195 shared
  • Joshua Graff Zivin

    National Bureau of Economic Research

    157 shared
  • Stephen P. Holland

    Yale University

    36 shared
  • Joseph E. Aldy

    35 shared
  • Andrew J. Yates

    29 shared
  • Christopher Costello

    University of British Columbia

    24 shared
  • Robert S. Gazzale

    21 shared
  • James H. Stock

    Harvard University

    21 shared
  • Resume-aware match score
  • Save to shortlist
  • AI-drafted outreach

See your match with Matthew J. Kotchen

PhdFit ranks faculty by your research interests, methods, and publications — grounded in their actual work, not templates.

  • Free to start
  • No credit card
  • 30-second signup