Resume-aware faculty matching

Find professors who actually fit you

Upload your resume. Four AI agents analyze your background, rank the faculty who fit, inspect their recent research, and help you draft outreach — grounded in their actual work, not templates.

Free to startNo credit cardCancel anytime
Top matches Balanced preset
Dr. Sarah Chen
Stanford · Interpretability · NLP
91
Dr. Marcus Holloway
MIT · Robotics · RL
84
Dr. Aisha Okonkwo
CMU · Fairness · HCI
82
Nova · Professor Researcher · re-ranking top 20…
Alexander Key

Alexander Key

Stanford University · Slavic Languages and Literatures

Active 1937–2022

h-index3
Citations55
Papers256 last 5y
Funding
See your match with Alexander Key — sign in to PhdFit.Sign in

About

Alexander Key is an Associate Professor of Comparative Literature and serves as the Division Director of Graduate Studies at Stanford University. His research interests encompass Arabic Languages, Literatures, and Cultures, as well as Language Theory, Literary and Cultural Theory, Literary Criticism (history of criticism, theory of literature), and Persian Languages, Literatures, and Cultures. His scholarly work focuses on exploring the intersections of language, literature, and culture within these regions and theoretical frameworks, contributing to the understanding of literary criticism and cultural studies in these areas.

Research signals

Five dimensions sourced from public faculty / publication signals. Sign in to compare against your own profile and see your match score.

Research topics

  • Philosophy
  • Literature
  • Linguistics
  • Art
  • History

Selected publications

  • What are Neoplatonic Poetics? Allegory; Figure; Genre

    British Academy eBooks · 2022-01-06

    book-chapter1st authorCorresponding

    This chapter uses the space between Greek Neoplatonism and Arabic Neoplatonism to ask what Neoplatonism is and how Neoplatonism appears in literary criticism. Starting with Robert Lowell, al-Ḥallāj, and Robert Duncan, I argue that Neoplatonic poetics is a judgement, made in our twenty-first century moment, that certain allegories contain Neoplatonic cosmologies. I examine Arabic and Greek taxonomical (Menander Rhetor and al-Marghīnānī’s rhetorical figures) and hermeneutical (al-Rāghib and Avicenna’s exegeses) scholarship, and I suggest that poetics itself can be looked at with three categories in mind: allegory, figure, and genre. Exegesis of the Qur’an, exegesis of the Rhapsodies and Oracles, and al-Ḥallāj’s poetry all revealed Neoplatonic truths through allegory. But Classical Arabic poetics did not identify these dynamics, because genre pressures led critics to focus on technique rather than content. We are the only critics who track Neoplatonic cosmologies across third-century Platonists and eleventh-century Muslims.

  • Notes around Ambiguity: Ibn Sīnā’s Logic, ʿAbd al-Qāhir al-Jurjānī’s Poetics, Rāghib’s Two-Meanings-at-One-Time, and the Figures of Ibhām, Istikhdām, and Tawriya

    2020-11-23

    book-chapter1st authorCorresponding

    Notes around Ambiguity: Ibn Sīnā’s Logic, ʿAbd al-Qāhir al-Jurjānī’s Poetics, Rāghib’s Two-Meanings-at-One-Time, and the Figures of Ibhām, Istikhdām, and Tawriya was published in Volume 2 Philosophy and Language in the Islamic World on page 77.

  • Note on Translation Practice, Transliterations, and Footnotes

    2019-11-13

    book-chapter1st authorCorresponding
  • Language between God and the Poets

    2019-10-28 · 8 citations

    bookOpen access1st authorCorresponding

    How does language work? How does language produce truth and beauty? Eleventh-century Arabic scholarship has detailed answers to these universal questions. Language Between God and the Poets reads the theory of four major scholars and asks how the conceptual vocabulary they shared enabled them to create theory in lexicography, theology, logic, and poetics. Their ideas engaged God and poetry at the nexus of language, mind, and reality. Their core conceptual vocabulary carved reality at the joints in a manner quite different from Anglophone and European thought in any period. This vocabulary centered around the words maʿnā (“mental content”) and ḥaqīqah (“accuracy”), two concepts for which Alexander Key develops a translation methodology with the help of Wittgenstein and Kuhn. Language Between God and the Poets helps us see how fundamental the lexicon and lexicography can be to all kinds of theory, how theology can be a science of naming, how logic interacts with language, and how poetic affect can be built on grammar and logic. The four scholars are ar-Rāġib al-Iṣfahānī, Ibn Fūrak, Ibn Sīnā (Avicenna), and ʿAbd al-Qāhir al-Ǧurǧānī.

  • 3. Translation

    2019-11-13

    book-chapterOpen access1st authorCorresponding
  • 7. Poetics

    2019-11-13

    book-chapterOpen access1st authorCorresponding
  • 4. The Lexicon

    2019-11-13

    book-chapterOpen access1st authorCorresponding
  • Language between God and the Poets

    2019-10-28 · 13 citations

    bookOpen access1st authorCorresponding
  • 5. Theology

    2019-11-13

    book-chapterOpen access1st authorCorresponding
  • Rhetorical Fabric of the Traditional Arabic Qasida in Its Formative Stages: A Comparative Study of the Rhetoric in Two Traditional Poems by ʿAlqama l-Fahl and Bashshar b. Burd. By Ali Ahmad Hussein

    Journal of the American Oriental Society · 2019-08-05

    articleOpen access1st authorCorresponding

    
 
 
 The Rhetorical Fabric of the Traditional Arabic Qaṣīda in Its Formative Stages: A Comparative Study of the Rhetoric in Two Traditional Poems by ʿAlqama l-Faḥl and Bashshār b. Burd. By Ali Ahmad Hussein. Abhandlungen für die Kunde des Morgenlandes, vol. 98. Wiesbaden: Harraaaowitz, 2015. Pp. xv + 292. €78 (paper).
 
 

Frequent coauthors

  • Russell T. McCutcheon

    University of Alabama

    16 shared
  • Donald S. Lopez

    16 shared
  • Ayatollah Khomeini

    New York University Press

    16 shared
  • Syed Shoeb Ahmed

    Princeton University

    16 shared
  • Shahzad Bashir

    16 shared
  • Emmanuel Lévinas

    16 shared
  • Guillaume Dye

    Ehlers-Danlos Society

    16 shared
  • Kitāb Al-Diyārāt

    New York University Press

    16 shared

Labs

  • Resume-aware match score
  • Save to shortlist
  • AI-drafted outreach

See your match with Alexander Key

PhdFit ranks faculty by your research interests, methods, and publications — grounded in their actual work, not templates.

  • Free to start
  • No credit card
  • 30-second signup