AnnMarie Liapakis
· MDVerifiedNew York University · Transplant
Active 2011–2025
About
As a hepatologist and transplant provider at NYU Langone, AnnMarie Liapakis is deeply committed to providing comprehensive and compassionate care to her patients. Her philosophy of care centers on treating the whole person, not just the specific liver disease, and she is passionate about dispelling myths and misinformation surrounding liver conditions. She specializes in managing a wide range of liver diseases, including advanced liver disease and liver transplantation, and has extensive experience in understanding how liver disease can affect other organ systems. Dr. Liapakis serves as the medical director of living donor liver transplantation at the NYU Langone Transplant Institute, where she works to maximize transplant opportunities and ensure the safety of living liver donors. Throughout her career, she has been actively involved in creating educational materials and advocating for policies that support patients with liver disease, working with organizations such as the American Liver Foundation and Donate Life Connecticut. Her dedication to patient education and advocacy has been recognized with honors such as the Physician of the Year award from the American Liver Foundation.
Research topics
- Political Science
- Surgery
- Medicine
- Public relations
- Engineering ethics
Selected publications
Clinics in Liver Disease · 2025-05-26
editorial1st authorCorrespondingAmerican Journal of Transplantation · 2025-10-22 · 1 citations
articleAASLD AST Practice Guideline on adult liver transplantation: Candidate evaluation
Hepatology · 2025-12-17 · 5 citations
articleOpen accessBACKGROUND AND AIMS: Liver transplant is a specialized treatment for a spectrum of indications that use a scarce resource. Transplant is guided by principles of justice, equity and benefit with a constant conflict between competing interests. Organs are a national resource with a goal of equitable distribution across sites. An AASLD guideline for the evaluation and selection of appropriate transplant candidates has been available since 2005. METHODS: A multidisciplinary writing group of liver transplant experts and a librarian convened over 24 months. The writing group reviewed the literature, generated guideline recommendations and rated the level of evidence for each recommendation based on the Oxford Center for Evidence-Based Medicine. The group categorized the strength of recommendations based on the level of evidence, risk-benefit ratio, and patient preferences. CONCLUSIONS: Liver transplant is a lifesaving procedure that should be offered to selected patients with clear indications and a reasonable prospect of benefit. The evaluation is designed to identify those in need, to outline hurdles to a successful outcome, and to develop an effective transplant plan. The goal of this document is to provide a template for this process.
American Journal of Transplantation · 2025-01-01
articleOpen accessAmerican Journal of Transplantation · 2025-08-01
articleSenior authorClinics in Liver Disease · 2025-07-15
article1st authorCorrespondingEngaging Transplant Professionals with a Novel Educational Model Using Social Media Visuals
American Journal of Transplantation · 2025-08-01
articleCurrent Transplantation Reports · 2025-07-12
articleOpen accessLiver Transplantation · 2025-12-18 · 2 citations
articleOpen accessLiving liver donation is a critical component for addressing organ shortage and improving outcomes for patients with end-stage liver disease. As the prevalence of living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) increases worldwide, understanding and optimizing long-term donor health is paramount. The 2025 International Liver Transplantation Society and International Living Donor Liver Transplantation Society (ILTS-iLDLT) Consensus Conference convened experts in the field of liver transplantation to establish evidence-based guidelines focused on the long-term medical, psychological, and social considerations following living liver donation. The aim of this working group was to integrate current evidence and expert consensus on donor follow-up protocols, risk assessment, and management strategies to promote long-term donor health, quality of life, and living liver donor programs globally to safeguard the welfare of this unique population.
The American Journal of Gastroenterology · 2025-10-01
articleSenior authorIntroduction: Sexual and gender minorities (SGM) are disproportionately affected by conditions that increase chronic liver disease risk, including viral hepatitis, alcohol use, diabetes, and obesity. However, data on cirrhosis prevalence among SGM is limited. This is the first study to describe cirrhosis prevalence, etiologies, and linkage to care in a predominantly Medicaid-insured SGM population. Methods: In our large, urban public hospital system, we identified adults with an International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision diagnosis of cirrhosis and self-reported sexual orientation and gender identity (SOGI) data from January 1, 2000 to May 1, 2025. Charts were reviewed to confirm cirrhosis (by imaging, elastography, or biopsy), determine etiology, and assess linkage to care defined as a gastroenterology or hepatology clinic visit in the last year. These outcomes were analyzed with descriptive statistics and compared to a non-SGM straight, cisgender cohort. Results: Of 7,451,107 adult patients in the system during the study period, 758,840 (10.2%) had SOGI data. 44,507 (5.9% of patients with SOGI data) identified as SGM. Ninety-five SGM and 2,506 non-SGM patients had cirrhosis. The SGM group was younger (mean age 53.2 vs 60.3 years, P < 0.05). Both cohorts were predominantly Hispanic (53.7% SGM vs 57.5% non-SGM), male sex at birth (77.9% vs 68.9%), and Medicaid-enrolled (62.1% vs 55.7%), Gay (47.4%) and cisgender men (62.1%) were the most represented identities in the SGM cohort. SGM had a lower cirrhosis prevalence (213 per 100,000; 95% CI 175–261) than non-SGM (351 per 100,000; CI 337–365). Leading causes in SGM were alcohol (54.7%, CI 44.7–64.4%) and viral hepatitis (26.3%, CI 18.5–36.0%), similar to non-SGM. Linkage to liver specialty care was low in both groups (37.9% SGM, CI 28.8–47.9%; 36.7% non-SGM, CI 34.8–38.6%). Conclusion: Despite lower observed cirrhosis prevalence in SGM, the figure is likely underestimated. Only 10% of patients had SOGI data, underscoring the need for expanded SOGI collection. This study is a critical step in understanding cirrhosis among SGM individuals with intersecting minority identities (SGM, Hispanic, underinsured) that impact access to care. Two-thirds of SGM patients with cirrhosis are not linked to specialty care. Future work includes expanding SOGI collection and developing targeted pathways to close care gaps. The younger age in SGM with cirrhosis also warrants further study, as it may reflect earlier exposure to risk factors leading to accelerated disease progression.
Frequent coauthors
- 16 shared
Raffi Karagozian
Tufts University
- 16 shared
Michael Cho
Harvard University
- 16 shared
Mena Bakhit
- 16 shared
Thomas R. McCarty
- 16 shared
Basile Njei
Brookdale University Hospital and Medical Center
- 16 shared
Sunhee Park
- 15 shared
Joseph K. Lim
VA Connecticut Healthcare System
- 13 shared
Benjamin Samstein
Awards & honors
- Physician of the Year award from the American Liver Foundati…
- Resume-aware match score
- Save to shortlist
- AI-drafted outreach
See your match with AnnMarie Liapakis
PhdFit ranks faculty by your research interests, methods, and publications — grounded in their actual work, not templates.
- Free to start
- No credit card
- 30-second signup