Resume-aware faculty matching

Find professors who actually fit you

Upload your resume. Four AI agents analyze your background, rank the faculty who fit, inspect their recent research, and help you draft outreach — grounded in their actual work, not templates.

Free to startNo credit cardCancel anytime
Top matches Balanced preset
Dr. Sarah Chen
Stanford · Interpretability · NLP
91
Dr. Marcus Holloway
MIT · Robotics · RL
84
Dr. Aisha Okonkwo
CMU · Fairness · HCI
82
Nova · Professor Researcher · re-ranking top 20…
Courtney Handman

Courtney Handman

· Associate Professor

University of Texas at Austin · Anthropology

Active 2007–2026

h-index10
Citations220
Papers6017 last 5y
Funding
See your match with Courtney Handman — sign in to PhdFit.Sign in

About

Courtney Handman is an Associate Professor in the College of Liberal Arts at the University of Texas at Austin. Her academic expertise spans linguistic anthropology, with particular interests in AI, translation, religion and media, and the anthropology of Christianity. Her research also explores circulation, infrastructures, decolonization, and the cultural dynamics of Melanesia, Papua New Guinea, and the Pacific region. Through her work, she investigates how language, religion, and media intersect within these contexts, contributing to broader understandings of cultural and social processes in these areas.

Research topics

  • Sociology
  • Theology
  • Religious studies
  • Environmental science
  • Philosophy
  • Anthropology
  • History

Selected publications

  • Response: The Starting Points for <i>Circulations</i>

    The Asia Pacific Journal of Anthropology · 2026-03-06

    article1st authorCorresponding
  • Animal translations: AI and the intelligibility of non‐human worlds

    Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute · 2026-04-14

    articleOpen access1st authorCorresponding

    Amid the general sense of worry that large language models will soon drown out human voices, some researchers are optimistic that machine learning will allow humans to listen to and understand animal voices to an unprecedented extent. As part of a broader project aimed at interspecies communication, a loosely connected set of animal behaviourists, AI engineers, and public‐facing animal advocates are working to comprehend ‘animal languages’ and thus to improve the lives of domesticated and wild species. Work in this field not only assumes a novel set of speakers (which can include, for some, plant as well as animal species), but it also contributes to a redefinition of what language is. This article examines how the expansion of language to non‐human animals is helping to produce posthuman worlds in which linguistic expertise is partially transferred from humans to machines. These new ways of defining language are especially visible in the forms of translation that people in the world of interspecies communication engage in that link animals, humans, and artificial intelligence. Repeating earlier moments in translation history, a new kind of linguistic expertise makes a new kind of translation possible.

  • Linguistic Approaches

    2026-01-20

    book-chapter1st authorCorresponding

    Abstract It is difficult to separate out linguistic from other approaches to the anthropological study of religion, since in some senses the study of religion has been organized by what might expansively be called linguistic approaches all along. The first half of this chapter examines some of the ways in which linguistic approaches (or linguistically derived models) have been used, focusing in particular on the theories of performance in ritual as well as on the cluster of work that emphasizes the role of linguistic or semiotic ideologies. In the second half of this chapter, linguistic approaches are contrasted to those focusing on affect and phenomenology, especially those that aim to bring to the fore seemingly nonlinguistic forms. It is argued that, at least as concerns the study of religion, any approach has to be paired with linguistic enunciations of moral orders, however partial they may end up being.

  • Ritual, Media, and the Here-and-Now of Decolonization

    Oxford University Press eBooks · 2025-01-23 · 9 citations

    book-chapter1st authorCorresponding

    Abstract This chapter contextualizes international demands for the self-government of former colonies, and addresses calls for decolonization after World War II in Papua New Guinea. In the 1950s, United Nations delegates began making novel ritual and bureaucratic utterances to call for self-government for colonial subjects, including a demand in 1956 that Australia start to move toward the independence of the Territory of New Guinea. Outraged, the Australian government and many in the Australian public argued against near-term independence. Delegitimizing the efficacy of the UN demand required a different contravening ritual event of constructed simultaneity that juxtaposed the primitivism of Papua New Guineans with UN demands for autonomy. The reporting in Australian tabloids of the May River Massacre offered a perfect opportunity. This chapter counterposes the UN’s demand for self-government with media coverage of this massacre to examine how simultaneity was used to delegitimate the ritual event of calling for decolonization.

  • The chatbot's real self: On the archaeology of artificial personas

    Journal of Linguistic Anthropology · 2025-12-26 · 2 citations

    articleOpen access1st authorCorresponding

    Abstract From the beginning of widespread public interactions with ChatGPT and other large language models, some users have seen the disfluencies of chatbots as opportunities for them to go on an archaeological search for an unfettered chatbot persona that they need to jailbreak. These are not claims of sentience, but rather of personhood. Moreover, they are part of a right‐leaning populist political project of defining speech that some find inflammatory, racist, or sexist as instead normal and needed for humans to be, like the jailbreaked chatbots, unfettered subjects.

  • Defying Predictions: Global Bureaucracy and the Art of Not Making Guesses about the Future of New Guinea

    2025-04-29

    book-chapterOpen access1st authorCorresponding

    Luminos is University of California Press’ Open Access publishing program for monographs. With the same high standards for selection, peer review, production and marketing as our traditional program, Luminos is a transformative model, built as a partnership where costs and benefits are shared.

  • Telepathy Tales: Tok Pisin, Communist Radio, and Other Channels of Illegitimate Circulation

    2025-04-29

    book-chapterOpen access1st authorCorresponding

    Luminos is University of California Press’ Open Access publishing program for monographs. With the same high standards for selection, peer review, production and marketing as our traditional program, Luminos is a transformative model, built as a partnership where costs and benefits are shared.

  • Remote Networks: Airplanes, Radios, and the Making of Communicative Distance in Lutheran New Guinea

    2025-04-29

    book-chapterOpen access1st authorCorresponding

    Luminos is University of California Press’ Open Access publishing program for monographs. With the same high standards for selection, peer review, production and marketing as our traditional program, Luminos is a transformative model, built as a partnership where costs and benefits are shared.

  • Demanding Independence on Behalf of Others: The Trusteeship Council and the Trust Territory of New Guinea

    2025-04-29

    book-chapterOpen access1st authorCorresponding

    Luminos is University of California Press’ Open Access publishing program for monographs. With the same high standards for selection, peer review, production and marketing as our traditional program, Luminos is a transformative model, built as a partnership where costs and benefits are shared.

  • Introduction

    2025-04-29

    book-chapterOpen access1st authorCorresponding

    Luminos is University of California Press’ Open Access publishing program for monographs. With the same high standards for selection, peer review, production and marketing as our traditional program, Luminos is a transformative model, built as a partnership where costs and benefits are shared.

Frequent coauthors

  • Maya Mayblin

    65 shared
  • James S. Bielo

    65 shared
  • Paul Anderson

    Liverpool John Moores University

    64 shared
  • Timothy Jen- Kins

    University of London

    64 shared
  • Edith Szanto

    University College London

    64 shared
  • Sune Haugbølle

    Roskilde University

    64 shared
  • Martin Holbraad

    64 shared
  • Astrid Krabbe Trolle

    University of Copenhagen

    64 shared
  • Resume-aware match score
  • Save to shortlist
  • AI-drafted outreach

See your match with Courtney Handman

PhdFit ranks faculty by your research interests, methods, and publications — grounded in their actual work, not templates.

  • Free to start
  • No credit card
  • 30-second signup