Resume-aware faculty matching

Find professors who actually fit you

Upload your resume. Four AI agents analyze your background, rank the faculty who fit, inspect their recent research, and help you draft outreach — grounded in their actual work, not templates.

Free to startNo credit cardCancel anytime
Top matches Balanced preset
Dr. Sarah Chen
Stanford · Interpretability · NLP
91
Dr. Marcus Holloway
MIT · Robotics · RL
84
Dr. Aisha Okonkwo
CMU · Fairness · HCI
82
Nova · Professor Researcher · re-ranking top 20…
Douglas Rivers:

Douglas Rivers:

· senior fellow at the Hoover Institution and a professor of political science

Stanford University · Political Economy

Active 1983–2023

h-index5
Citations144
Papers101 last 5y
Funding
See your match with Douglas Rivers: — sign in to PhdFit.Sign in

Research topics

  • Political Science
  • Computer Security
  • Computer Science
  • Internet privacy
  • Psychology
  • Marketing
  • Business
  • Data science
  • Public relations

Selected publications

  • Protecting the integrity of survey research

    PNAS Nexus · 2023 · 25 citations

    • Computer Science
    • Political Science
    • Computer Security

    Although polling is not irredeemably broken, changes in technology and society create challenges that, if not addressed well, can threaten the quality of election polls and other important surveys on topics such as the economy. This essay describes some of these challenges and recommends remediations to protect the integrity of all kinds of survey research, including election polls. These 12 recommendations specify ways that survey researchers, and those who use polls and other public-oriented surveys, can increase the accuracy and trustworthiness of their data and analyses. Many of these recommendations align practice with the scientific norms of transparency, clarity, and self-correction. The transparency recommendations focus on improving disclosure of factors that affect the nature and quality of survey data. The clarity recommendations call for more precise use of terms such as "representative sample" and clear description of survey attributes that can affect accuracy. The recommendation about correcting the record urges the creation of a publicly available, professionally curated archive of identified technical problems and their remedies. The paper also calls for development of better benchmarks and for additional research on the effects of panel conditioning. Finally, the authors suggest ways to help people who want to use or learn from survey research understand the strengths and limitations of surveys and distinguish legitimate and problematic uses of these methods.

Frequent coauthors

  • Simon Jackman

    University of Sydney

    77 shared
  • Joshua D. Clinton

    Vanderbilt University

    75 shared
  • Andrew Gelman

    Columbia University

    5 shared
  • Rob Trangucci

    3 shared
  • David Rothschild

    2 shared
  • Sharad Goel

    John F. Kennedy University

    2 shared
  • Henry E Brady

    University of California, Berkeley

    2 shared
  • I Ali

    2 shared

Similar researchers at Stanford University

  • Resume-aware match score
  • Save to shortlist
  • AI-drafted outreach

See your match with Douglas Rivers:

PhdFit ranks faculty by your research interests, methods, and publications — grounded in their actual work, not templates.

  • Free to start
  • No credit card
  • 30-second signup