Resume-aware faculty matching

Find professors who actually fit you

Upload your resume. Four AI agents analyze your background, rank the faculty who fit, inspect their recent research, and help you draft outreach — grounded in their actual work, not templates.

Free to startNo credit cardCancel anytime
Top matches Balanced preset
Dr. Sarah Chen
Stanford · Interpretability · NLP
91
Dr. Marcus Holloway
MIT · Robotics · RL
84
Dr. Aisha Okonkwo
CMU · Fairness · HCI
82
Nova · Professor Researcher · re-ranking top 20…

Olivier Toubia

Verified

Columbia University · Strategy and Entrepreneurship

Active 2001–2024

h-index27
Citations4.1k
Papers9724 last 5y
Funding
See your match with Olivier Toubia — sign in to PhdFit.Sign in

Research topics

  • Computer Science
  • Natural Language Processing
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Machine Learning
  • Psychology
  • Political Science
  • Social psychology
  • Economics
  • Information Retrieval
  • Cognitive psychology
  • Advertising
  • Statistics
  • Business
  • Knowledge management
  • Medicine
  • Human–computer interaction
  • Linguistics
  • Data science
  • Philosophy
  • Econometrics
  • Marketing
  • Mathematics
  • Programming language

Selected publications

  • Large Language Models are Prone to Methodological Artifacts

    SSRN Electronic Journal · 2023 · 1 citations

    Senior authorCorresponding
    • Computer Science
    • Natural Language Processing
    • Computer Science
  • The Challenge of Using LLMs to Simulate Human Behavior: A Causal Inference Perspective

    SSRN Electronic Journal · 2023 · 33 citations

    Senior authorCorresponding
    • Computer Science
    • Machine Learning
    • Artificial Intelligence
  • The More You Ask, the Less You Get: When Additional Questions Hurt External Validity

    Journal of Marketing Research · 2021 · 28 citations

    • Computer Science
    • Psychology
    • Cognitive psychology

    Researchers and practitioners in marketing, economics, and public policy often use preference elicitation tasks to forecast real-world behaviors. These tasks typically ask a series of similarly structured questions. The authors posit that every time a respondent answers an additional elicitation question, two things happen: (1) they provide information about some parameter(s) of interest, such as their time preference or the partworth for a product attribute, and (2) the respondent increasingly “adapts” to the task—that is, using task-specific decision processes specialized for this task that may or may not apply to other tasks. Importantly, adaptation comes at the cost of potential mismatch between the task-specific decision process and real-world processes that generate the target behaviors, such that asking more questions can reduce external validity. The authors used mouse and eye tracking to trace decision processes in time preference measurement and conjoint choice tasks. Respondents increasingly relied on task-specific decision processes as more questions were asked, leading to reduced external validity for both related tasks and real-world behaviors. Importantly, the external validity of measured preferences peaked after as few as seven questions in both types of tasks. When measuring preferences, less can be more.

  • Letting Logos Speak: Leveraging Multiview Representation Learning for Data-Driven Branding and Logo Design

    Marketing Science · 2021 · 86 citations

    Senior authorCorresponding
    • Computer Science
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • Computer Science

    The authors develop a decision support system for design and branding based on a multimodal variational autoencoder that merges image, text, and ratings data.

Frequent coauthors

  • Resume-aware match score
  • Save to shortlist
  • AI-drafted outreach

See your match with Olivier Toubia

PhdFit ranks faculty by your research interests, methods, and publications — grounded in their actual work, not templates.

  • Free to start
  • No credit card
  • 30-second signup