Resume-aware faculty matching

Find professors who actually fit you

Upload your resume. Four AI agents analyze your background, rank the faculty who fit, inspect their recent research, and help you draft outreach — grounded in their actual work, not templates.

Free to startNo credit cardCancel anytime
Top matches Balanced preset
Dr. Sarah Chen
Stanford · Interpretability · NLP
91
Dr. Marcus Holloway
MIT · Robotics · RL
84
Dr. Aisha Okonkwo
CMU · Fairness · HCI
82
Nova · Professor Researcher · re-ranking top 20…
John Park

John Park

Brown University · Professional Master's Programs

Active 2002–2024

h-index35
Citations4.2k
Papers211155 last 5y
Funding$37.8M1 active
See your match with John Park — sign in to PhdFit.Sign in

Research topics

  • Medicine
  • Sociology
  • Political Science
  • Geography
  • Criminology
  • Nursing
  • Environmental health
  • Psychiatry
  • Anesthesia
  • Law
  • Virology
  • Social psychology
  • Psychology
  • Pharmacology

Selected publications

  • COVID-19 vaccine intentions in the United States, a social-ecological framework

    Vaccine · 2021 · 188 citations

    • Virology
    • Geography
    • Medicine
  • An assessment of the limits of detection, sensitivity and specificity of three devices for public health-based drug checking of fentanyl in street-acquired samples

    International Journal of Drug Policy · 2020 · 207 citations

    • Medicine
    • Anesthesia
    • Pharmacology

    BACKGROUND: Fentanyl has caused rapid increases in US and Canadian overdose deaths, yet its presence in illicit drugs is often unknown to consumers. This study examined the validity in identifying the presence of fentanyl of three portable devices that could be used in providing drug checking services and drug supply surveillance: fentanyl test strips, a hand-held Raman Spectrometer, and a desktop Fourier-Transform Infrared Spectrometer. METHODS: In Fall 2017, we first undertook an assessment of the limits of detection for fentanyl, then tested the three devices' sensitivity and specificity in distinguishing fentanyl in street-acquired drug samples. Utilizing test replicates of standard fentanyl reference material over a range of increasingly lower concentrations, we determined the lowest concentration reliably detected. To establish the sensitivity and specificity for fentanyl, 210 samples (106 fentanyl-positive, 104 fentanyl-negative) previously submitted by law enforcement entities to forensic laboratories in Baltimore, Maryland, and Providence, Rhode Island, were tested using the devices. All sample testing followed parallel and standardized protocols in the two labs. RESULTS: The lowest limit of detection (0.100 mcg/mL), false negative (3.7%), and false positive rate (9.6%) was found for fentanyl test strips, which also correctly detected two fentanyl analogs (acetyl fentanyl and furanyl fentanyl) alone or in the presence of another drug, in both powder and pill forms. While less sensitive and specific for fentanyl, the other devices conveyed additional relevant information including the percentage of fentanyl and presence of cutting agents and other drugs. CONCLUSION: Devices for fentanyl drug checking are available and valid. Drug checking services and drug supply surveillance should be considered and researched as part of public health responses to the opioid overdose crisis.

  • Situating the Continuum of Overdose Risk in the Social Determinants of Health: A New Conceptual Framework

    Milbank Quarterly · 2020 · 163 citations

    1st authorCorresponding
    • Political Science
    • Sociology
    • Medicine

    Policy Points This article reconceptualizes our understanding of the opioid epidemic and proposes six strategies that address the epidemic's social roots. In order to successfully reduce drug-related mortality over the long term, policymakers and public health leaders should develop partnerships with people who use drugs, incorporate harm reduction interventions, and reverse decades of drug criminalization policies. CONTEXT: Drug overdose is the leading cause of injury-related death in the United States. Synthetic opioids, predominantly illicit fentanyl and its analogs, surpassed prescription opioids and heroin in associated mortality rates in 2016. Unfortunately, interventions fail to fully address the current wave of the opioid epidemic and often omit the voices of people with lived experiences regarding drug use. Every overdose death is a culmination of a long series of policy failures and lost opportunities for harm reduction. METHODS: In this article, we conducted a scoping review of the opioid literature to propose a novel framework designed to foreground social determinants more directly into our understanding of this national emergency. The "continuum of overdose risk" framework is our synthesis of the global evidence base and is grounded in contemporary theories, models, and policies that have been successfully applied both domestically and internationally. FINDINGS: De-escalating overdose risk in the long term will require scaling up innovative and comprehensive solutions that have been designed through partnerships with people who use drugs and are rooted in harm reduction. CONCLUSIONS: Without recognizing the full drug-use continuum and the role of social determinants, the current responses to drug overdose will continue to aggravate the problem they are trying to solve.

Recent grants

Frequent coauthors

  • Susan G. Sherman

    Johns Hopkins University

    140 shared
  • Traci C. Green

    Rhode Island Hospital

    99 shared
  • Saba Rouhani

    78 shared
  • Miles Morris

    Johns Hopkins University

    60 shared
  • Glenna J. Urquhart

    Johns Hopkins University

    58 shared
  • Joseph G. Rosen

    Johns Hopkins University

    57 shared
  • Erin Thompson

    Rhode Island Hospital

    50 shared
  • Rejwi Dahal

    Indiana University

    49 shared

Similar researchers at Brown University

  • Resume-aware match score
  • Save to shortlist
  • AI-drafted outreach

See your match with John Park

PhdFit ranks faculty by your research interests, methods, and publications — grounded in their actual work, not templates.

  • Free to start
  • No credit card
  • 30-second signup