Resume-aware faculty matching

Find professors who actually fit you

Upload your resume. Four AI agents analyze your background, rank the faculty who fit, inspect their recent research, and help you draft outreach — grounded in their actual work, not templates.

Free to startNo credit cardCancel anytime
Top matches Balanced preset
Dr. Sarah Chen
Stanford · Interpretability · NLP
91
Dr. Marcus Holloway
MIT · Robotics · RL
84
Dr. Aisha Okonkwo
CMU · Fairness · HCI
82
Nova · Professor Researcher · re-ranking top 20…
John C. Haltiwanger

John C. Haltiwanger

· Distinguished University Professor; Dudley and Louisa Dillard Professor of EconomicsVerified

University of Maryland, College Park · Economics

Active 1979–2026

h-index99
Citations49.1k
Papers841131 last 5y
Funding$684k
See your match with John C. Haltiwanger — sign in to PhdFit.Sign in

About

Professor John C. Haltiwanger is a faculty member at the University of Maryland, College Park, where he holds the position of Professor of Economics. His contact information includes a telephone number, fax, and email address, indicating active engagement in academic and professional communication. The webpage references his recent papers, teaching activities, and keynote addresses, suggesting a focus on economic research and education. Additionally, he is associated with the Center for Economic Studies at the Bureau of the Census, which aligns with his research interests in economic data analysis, job flows, and firm-level productivity distributions. His work involves analyzing gross job flows, job creation and destruction, and cross-country data on economic activity, as evidenced by the mention of data and code for specific research papers and macroeconomic data from NBER. Overall, his profile reflects a strong emphasis on empirical research in macroeconomics, labor economics, and economic data analysis.

Research topics

  • Economics
  • Computer Science
  • Macroeconomics
  • Engineering
  • Statistics
  • Mathematics
  • Monetary economics
  • Mechanical engineering
  • Econometrics
  • Economic growth
  • Business
  • Labour economics

Selected publications

  • Code for: Quality Adjustment at Scale: Hedonic vs Exact Demand-Based Price Indices

    ICPSR Data Holdings · 2026-04-09

    datasetOpen access

    Item-level transactions data yield cost-of-living indices that can account for qualitychange and consumer substitution. Transactions data require confronting the rapidturnover of items because prices of new and existing products are interrelated in equilibrium. This paper evaluates multiple approaches to measuring quality change atscale. It shows that a hedonic superlative approach—using econometrics or machinelearning for hedonic estimation combined with index formulas that require simultaneousobservation of item-level price and expenditure—yields improved measures of thecost of living. Accounting for ubiquitous quality change and for consumer substitutionyields lower measures of inflation than traditional, official methods.

  • Code for: Quality Adjustment at Scale: Hedonic vs Exact Demand-Based Price Indices

    ICPSR Data Holdings · 2026-04-09

    datasetOpen access

    Item-level transactions data yield cost-of-living indices that can account for qualitychange and consumer substitution. Transactions data require confronting the rapidturnover of items because prices of new and existing products are interrelated in equilibrium. This paper evaluates multiple approaches to measuring quality change atscale. It shows that a hedonic superlative approach—using econometrics or machinelearning for hedonic estimation combined with index formulas that require simultaneousobservation of item-level price and expenditure—yields improved measures of thecost of living. Accounting for ubiquitous quality change and for consumer substitutionyields lower measures of inflation than traditional, official methods.

  • Local Origins of Business Formation

    SSRN Electronic Journal · 2025-01-01

    preprintOpen access
  • Job Displacement and Earnings Losses: The Role of Joblessness

    American Economic Journal Macroeconomics · 2025-03-28 · 9 citations

    article

    A large literature finds that workers displaced in mass layoffs experience persistent earnings losses. We find that the earnings penalty from job displacement is mediated by the length of the jobless spell after displacement. Workers who experience little or no joblessness suffer no losses on average; those who experience a prolonged period of joblessness experience large, persistent earnings losses. Job movers who experience joblessness tend to move to lower-paying firms, a phenomenon that informs our understanding of the mechanisms that generate earnings losses. We also find that jobless duration predicts earnings outcomes for separators generally, not only displaced workers. (JEL E24, J24, J31, J62, J63, J64)

  • Firm growth and stagnation in the United States: Key trends and new data opportunities

    Strategic Management Journal · 2025-11-27

    articleOpen accessSenior author

    Abstract Research Summary Using administrative data from the US Census Bureau, we introduce a new public‐use dataset (“Business Dynamics Statistics—High Growth” [BDS‐HG]) that captures the full distribution of firm growth in the United States between 1978 and 2021. BDS‐HG enables researchers to analyze not only high‐growth firms but also stagnant and shrinking firms, disaggregated by firm maturity, size, industry, region, and year. We begin by documenting two key trends: (1) a significant decline in the share of high‐growth firms—especially among young and small firms and (2) a marked rise in stagnant firms. To help illustrate the dataset's usefulness, we provide three empirical applications and highlight research opportunities across major areas of strategic management. In addition to supporting new analyses, BDS‐HG can be used to benchmark research samples and assess their generalizability. Managerial Summary The US economy has seen two major shifts in firm growth dynamics: a steady decline in the share of high‐growth firms—especially among startups—and a notable rise in firms that exhibit no growth. We document these patterns using BDS‐HG, a new public‐use dataset from the US Census Bureau that tracks employment growth across all US employer businesses from 1978 to 2021. The data are disaggregated by firm age, size, industry, geography, and year, enabling users to examine growth trends across sectors and regions. BDS‐HG offers a valuable resource for researchers, policymakers, and analysts seeking to understand long‐term business dynamism. It can also be used to benchmark research samples against national patterns, helping users assess how representative their data or findings are.

  • The (Heterogeneous) Economic Effects of Private Equity Buyouts

    Management Science · 2025-03-25 · 8 citations

    article

    The effects of private equity buyouts on employment, productivity, and job reallocation vary tremendously with macroeconomic and credit conditions, across private equity groups, and by type of buyout. We reach this conclusion by examining the most extensive database of U.S. buyouts ever compiled, encompassing thousands of buyout targets from 1980 to 2013 and millions of control firms. Employment shrinks 12% over two years after buyouts of publicly listed firms—on average, and relative to control firms—but expands 15% after buyouts of privately held firms. Postbuyout productivity gains at target firms are large on average and much larger yet for deals executed amid tight credit conditions. A postbuyout tightening of credit conditions or slowing of gross domestic product growth curtails employment growth and intrafirm job reallocation at target firms. We also show that buyout effects differ across the private equity groups that sponsor buyouts, and these differences persist over time at the group level. Rapid upscaling in deal flow at the group level brings lower employment growth at target firms. We relate these findings to theories of private equity that highlight agency problems at portfolio firms and within the private equity industry itself. This paper was accepted by David Sraer, finance. Funding: This work was supported by Harvard Business School’s Division of Research, the Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation, the Smith Richardson Foundation [Grant no. 2014-0136], and the Private Capital Research Institute. Supplemental Material: The online appendix is available at https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2021.03890 .

  • Financing, Ownership, and Performance: A Novel, Longitudinal Firm-Level Database

    SSRN Electronic Journal · 2025-01-01

    preprintOpen access
  • Rising Top, Falling Bottom: Industries and Rising Wage Inequality

    American Economic Review · 2024-09-27 · 12 citations

    article1st authorCorresponding

    Most of the rise in overall earnings inequality from 1996 to 2018 is accounted for by rising between-industry dispersion. The contribution of industries is right-skewed with the top 10 percent of four-digit NAICS industries dominating. The top 10 percent are clustered in high-paying high-tech and low-paying retail sectors. In the top industries, high-wage workers are increasingly sorted to high-wage industries with rising industry premia. In the bottom industries, low-wage workers are increasingly sorted into lowwage industries, with rising employment and falling industry wage premia. (JEL J23, J24, J31, L25, M52)

  • High tech business entry in the pandemic era

    FEDS Notes · 2024-04-01 · 5 citations

    articleOpen accessSenior author

    The COVID-19 pandemic and its aftermath have featured a surge in business entry (Decker and Haltiwanger 2024). A natural question is whether the elevated entry seen in recent years will have positive implications for aggregate productivity growth given the historically important role of business entry for productivity dynamics (Decker et al. 2014, Alon et al. 2018).

  • Declining responsiveness at the establishment level: Sources and productivity implications

    2024-02-14

    paratextOpen access

    This paper studies competing sources of declining dynamism. Evidence shows that an important component of this decline is accounted for by the reduction in the response of employment to shocks in US establishments. Using a plant-level dynamic optimization problem as a framework for analysis, four potential reasons for this decline are studied: (i) a change in exogenous processes for profits, (ii) an increase in impatience, (iii) increased market power, and (iv) increasing adjustment costs. We identify and quantity the contribution of each of these factors building on a simulated method of moments estimation of our structural model. Our results indicate that the reduction in responsiveness largely reflects increased costs of employment adjustment. Changes in market power, as captured by changes in the curvature of the revenue function, play a minimal role. But, in the presence of rising adjustment costs, measured sales-weighted markups using the recently popular indirect production approach rise substantially, along with rising dispersion and skewness of such measured markups.

Recent grants

Frequent coauthors

  • Steven J. Davis

    Hoover Institution

    410 shared
  • Ron S. Jarmin

    United States Census Bureau

    204 shared
  • Fredrik Andersson

    Statistics Sweden

    178 shared
  • Javier Miranda

    173 shared
  • Julia Lane

    RTI International

    130 shared
  • Lucia Foster

    130 shared
  • Cheryl Grim

    United States Census Bureau

    101 shared
  • Mark Kutzbach

    88 shared

Education

  • Ph.D.

    Johns Hopkins University

    1981

Awards & honors

  • Julius Shiskin Award for economic statistics (2013)
  • Roger Herriott Award for innovation in federal statistics (2…
  • Global Entrepreneurship Research Award (2020)
  • Resume-aware match score
  • Save to shortlist
  • AI-drafted outreach

See your match with John C. Haltiwanger

PhdFit ranks faculty by your research interests, methods, and publications — grounded in their actual work, not templates.

  • Free to start
  • No credit card
  • 30-second signup