Resume-aware faculty matching

Find professors who actually fit you

Upload your resume. Four AI agents analyze your background, rank the faculty who fit, inspect their recent research, and help you draft outreach — grounded in their actual work, not templates.

Free to startNo credit cardCancel anytime
Top matches Balanced preset
Dr. Sarah Chen
Stanford · Interpretability · NLP
91
Dr. Marcus Holloway
MIT · Robotics · RL
84
Dr. Aisha Okonkwo
CMU · Fairness · HCI
82
Nova · Professor Researcher · re-ranking top 20…
Kirill Borusyak

Kirill Borusyak

· Edwin C. Voorhees Endowed Assistant Professor

University of California, Berkeley · Resource Economics and Policy

Active 2011–2026

h-index19
Citations2.9k
Papers4637 last 5y
Funding
See your match with Kirill Borusyak — sign in to PhdFit.Sign in

About

Kirill Borusyak is the Edwin C. Voorhees Endowed Assistant Professor at UC Berkeley's Agricultural and Resource Economics department, with an affiliation at the Economics department. His research covers topics in international trade and applied econometrics. He holds a Ph.D. in Economics from Harvard University, obtained in 2018 under the supervision of Pol Antrás. Additionally, he earned an M.A. in Economics from the New Economic School in 2012, graduating Summa Cum Laude, and a Diploma in Economics and Mathematics from the Financial University in Moscow in 2009 with Highest Honors. Borusyak is also an Associate Editor at the Journal of European Economic Association and is affiliated with CEPR, CeMMAP, CReAM, IFS, UCL's Stone Centre for Inequality, and the CEP Trade Programme.

Research topics

  • Computer Science
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Mathematics
  • Econometrics
  • Statistics
  • Economics

Selected publications

  • Nonparametric Identification of Demand without Exogenous Product Characteristics

    SSRN Electronic Journal · 2026-01-01

    preprintOpen access1st authorCorresponding
  • A Practical Guide to Shift-Share Instruments

    The Journal of Economic Perspectives · 2025-02-01 · 101 citations

    articleOpen access1st authorCorresponding

    A recent econometric literature shows two distinct paths for identification with shift-share instruments, leveraging either many exogenous shifts or exogenous shares. We present the core logic of both paths and practical takeaways via simple checklists. A variety of empirical settings illustrate key points.

  • Estimating Demand with Recentered Instruments

    ArXiv.org · 2025-04-05

    preprintOpen access1st authorCorresponding

    We develop a new approach to estimating flexible demand models with exogenous supply-side shocks. Our approach avoids conventional assumptions of exogenous product characteristics, putting no restrictions on product entry, despite using instrumental variables that incorporate characteristic variation. The proposed instruments are model-predicted responses of endogenous variables to the exogenous shocks, recentered to avoid bias from endogenous characteristics. We illustrate the approach in a series of Monte Carlo simulations.

  • Design-based identification with formula instruments: a review

    Econometrics Journal · 2024-01-27 · 13 citations

    reviewOpen access1st authorCorresponding

    Summary Many studies in economics use instruments or treatments that combine a set of exogenous shocks with other predetermined variables via a known formula. Examples include shift-share instruments and measures of social or spatial spillovers. We review recent econometric tools for this setting, which leverage the assignment process of the exogenous shocks and the structure of the formula for identification. We compare this design-based approach with conventional estimation strategies based on conditional unconfoundedness, and contrast it with alternative strategies that leverage a model for unobservables.

  • Negative Weights are No Concern in Design-Based Specifications

    SSRN Electronic Journal · 2024-01-01 · 2 citations

    articleOpen access1st authorCorresponding
  • Replication package for: "Revisiting Event Study Designs: Robust and Efficient Estimation"

    Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2024-10-24

    datasetOpen access1st authorCorresponding

    This replication package contains the code and instructions necessary to replicate Borusyak, Kirill, Xavier Jaravel, and Jann Spiess. "Revisiting event study designs: Robust and efficient estimation." Forthcoming Review of Economic Studies (2023).

  • Replication package for: "Revisiting Event Study Designs: Robust and Efficient Estimation"

    London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science) · 2024-10-24

    datasetOpen access1st authorCorresponding

    This replication package contains the code and instructions necessary to replicate Borusyak, Kirill, Xavier Jaravel, and Jann Spiess. "Revisiting event study designs: Robust and efficient estimation." Forthcoming Review of Economic Studies (2023).

  • Negative Weights are No Concern in Design-Based Specifications

    National Bureau of Economic Research · 2024-01-01 · 4 citations

    reportOpen access1st authorCorresponding

    Recent work shows that popular partially-linear regression specifications can put negative weights on some treatment effects, potentially producing incorrectly-signed estimands.We counter by showing that negative weights are no problem in design-based specifications, in which low-dimensional controls span the conditional expectation of the treatment.Specifically, the estimands of such specifications are convex averages of causal effects with "ex-ante" weights that average the potentially negative "ex-post" weights across possible treatment realizations.This result extends to design-based instrumental variable estimands under a first-stage monotonicity condition, and applies to "formula" treatments and instruments such as shift-share instruments.

  • A Practical Guide to Shift-Share Instruments

    National Bureau of Economic Research · 2024-12-01 · 15 citations

    reportOpen access1st authorCorresponding

    A recent econometric literature shows two distinct paths for identification with shift-share instruments, leveraging either many exogenous shifts or exogenous shares. We present the core logic of both paths and practical takeaways via simple checklists. A variety of empirical settings illustrate key points.

  • Negative Weights Are No Concern in Design-Based Specifications

    AEA Papers and Proceedings · 2024-05-01 · 3 citations

    article1st authorCorresponding

    Recent work shows that popular partially-linear regression specifications can put negative weights on some treatment effects, potentially producing incorrectly-signed estimands. We show this is not an issue in design-based specifications, in which low-dimensional controls span the conditional expectation of the treatment. Specifically, the estimands of such specifications are convex averages of causal effects with ex-ante weights that average the potentially negative ex-post weights across possible treatment realizations. This result extends to design-based instrumental variable estimands under a first-stage monotonicity condition and applies to formula treatments and instruments such as shift-share instruments.

Frequent coauthors

  • Peter Hull

    John Brown University

    66 shared
  • Xavier Jaravel

    Laser Scan Engineering (United Kingdom)

    55 shared
  • Jann Spiess

    8 shared
  • Clara von Bismarck-Osten

    University College London

    4 shared
  • Uta Schönberg

    IZA - Institute of Labor Economics

    4 shared
  • Brown Xavier

    University College Lahore

    4 shared
  • Jaravel Lse

    Institute for Fiscal Studies

    4 shared
  • Rafael Dix-Carneiro

    Duke University

    1 shared
  • Resume-aware match score
  • Save to shortlist
  • AI-drafted outreach

See your match with Kirill Borusyak

PhdFit ranks faculty by your research interests, methods, and publications — grounded in their actual work, not templates.

  • Free to start
  • No credit card
  • 30-second signup