Resume-aware faculty matching

Find professors who actually fit you

Upload your resume. Four AI agents analyze your background, rank the faculty who fit, inspect their recent research, and help you draft outreach — grounded in their actual work, not templates.

Free to startNo credit cardCancel anytime
Top matches Balanced preset
Dr. Sarah Chen
Stanford · Interpretability · NLP
91
Dr. Marcus Holloway
MIT · Robotics · RL
84
Dr. Aisha Okonkwo
CMU · Fairness · HCI
82
Nova · Professor Researcher · re-ranking top 20…

Marcus Bull

· Professor

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · History

Active 1826–2022

h-index10
Citations290
Papers601 last 5y
Funding
See your match with Marcus Bull — sign in to PhdFit.Sign in

Research topics

  • Philosophy

Selected publications

  • The <i>De Gestis Herwardi </i>as a Crusade Text

    Outremer. Studies in the Crusades and the Latin East · 2022

    1st authorCorresponding
    • Philosophy
  • War

    2019-01-01

    other1st authorCorresponding
  • 2 The Second Crusade: The De Expugnatione Lyxbonensi and Odo of Deuil’s De Profectione Ludovici VII in Orientem

    Boydell and Brewer eBooks · 2018-12-31

    book-chapter1st authorCorresponding
  • Eyewitness and Crusade Narrative

    Boydell & Brewer eBooks · 2018-09-01 · 5 citations

    book1st authorCorresponding
  • Eyewitness and Crusade Narrative: Perception and Narration in Accounts of the Second, Third and Fourth Crusades

    2018-09-21

    bookOpen access1st authorCorresponding

    The idea of what an "eyewitness" account is here scrutinised through examination of key Crusading texts

  • Eyewitness and Crusade Narrative

    Boydell and Brewer eBooks · 2018-12-31 · 3 citations

    book1st authorCorresponding
  • 4 Geoffrey of Villehardouin’s and Robert of Clari’s Narratives of the Fourth Crusade

    Boydell and Brewer eBooks · 2018-12-31

    book-chapter1st authorCorresponding
  • Eyewitness and Medieval Historical Narrative

    2017-01-01 · 1 citations

    book-chapter1st authorCorresponding

    Historians routinely make judgements about sources according to whether or not they are ‘eyewitness’. But this is a category that has received little scholarly attention, a surprising omission given the emergent interest in historical experientiality, as well as in light of the research undertaken into eyewitness perception and memory by cognitive and social psychologists. This paper examines the interest in autopsy demonstrated by ancient historians, and then assesses the extent to which medieval writers’ approaches to eyewitness evidence matched those of their classical predecessors. The paper concludes with an analysis of two eyewitness texts—Robert de Clari’s account of the Fourth Crusade, and Francesco Balbi di Correggio’s history of the Great Siege of Malta—in order to consider the role that eyewitnessing could play as a plot device within a narrative, and the manner in which an eyewitness author might situate his autoptic status relative to other validating strategies.

  • The Relationship Between the Gesta Francorum and Peter Tudebode’s Historia de Hierosolymitano Itinere: The Evidence of a Hitherto Unexamined Manuscript (St. Catharine’s College, Cambridge, 3)

    2016-08-12 · 1 citations

    article1st authorCorresponding
  • Jeanette Beer. <i>In Their Own Words: Practices of Quotation in Early Medieval History-Writing</i> .

    The American Historical Review · 2016-12-01

    article1st authorCorresponding

    Jeanette Beer’s In Their Own Words: Practices of Quotation in Early Medieval History-Writing is a welcome addition to an expanding field. Her approach in this study of various medieval historical works dating from between the ninth and thirteenth centuries involves a series of case studies foregrounding texts that broke, or appear to have broken, new ground substantively or stylistically or both: Nithard’s Historiae de dissensionibus filiorum Ludovici Pii, which contains the first extant sequence of vernacular French in the form of the famous Strasbourg Oaths; the Gesta Francorum, the earliest eyewitness account of the First Crusade (although this is a status that has been problematized in recent research); Geoffrey of Villehardouin’s and Robert of Clari’s accounts of the Fourth Crusade, the first prose histories written in French; and Li Fet des Romains, an early-thirteenth-century prose compilation and translation of all the materials that were then known concerning the career of Julius Caesar, which Beers argues is the first work of ancient history, and the first biography, to appear in French. The book’s central argument is that a close examination of each text’s practices of quotation—which can assume many forms, from the rendering of ipsissima verba to free indirect discourse, literary quotation, citation, allusion, and self-referencing—is an optimal route into an understanding of medieval historiographical practice and the influences upon it of both inherited classical forms and contemporary vernacular poetics. In so arguing, Beer sets her face against positivist minings of such texts for serviceable historical data. The point is well made, although there may be an element of pushing at an open door in light of the recent expansion of scholarly understanding of the complexity of medieval historiographical culture, in particular with respect to its regimes of truth.

Frequent coauthors

  • Miri Rubin

    4 shared
  • J. A. Burrow

    3 shared
  • Ian P. Wei

    University of Bristol

    2 shared
  • Piero Boitani

    Schneeberger (Switzerland)

    2 shared
  • Elizabeth A. R. Brown

    2 shared
  • Jean-Claude Schmitt

    2 shared
  • Damien Kempf

    2 shared
  • Paul A Brand

    2 shared

Labs

  • Beyond the Classroom Public-Facing History Launch (Lab @ UNC History)PI

  • Resume-aware match score
  • Save to shortlist
  • AI-drafted outreach

See your match with Marcus Bull

PhdFit ranks faculty by your research interests, methods, and publications — grounded in their actual work, not templates.

  • Free to start
  • No credit card
  • 30-second signup