
Pamela Jagger
VerifiedUniversity of Michigan · Public Policy
Active 1985–2026
About
Pamela Jagger is a professor at the University of Michigan School for Environment and Sustainability, with a courtesy appointment at the Gerald R. Ford School of Public Policy. She is an applied political economist whose research focuses on the dynamics of poverty and environment interactions in low-income countries. She leads the interdisciplinary Forest Use, Energy, and Livelihoods (FUEL) Lab and is the Director of the National Science Foundation funded Energy Poverty PIRE in Southern Africa (EPPSA), a five-year collaborative program supporting research and training on energy access in Southern Africa. Her research organization encompasses three themes: quantifying the role of forest and environmental resources in household consumption and income generation, understanding how contributions change in response to land use, conservation, development projects, and population dynamics; examining the livelihood impacts of changes in environmental governance and institutions on access to environmental goods and services; and understanding household energy access, including the effectiveness of interventions designed to mitigate energy poverty. Dr. Jagger has worked as a policy research scholar with organizations such as the World Bank, Resources for the Future, the International Food Policy Research Institute, and the Center for International Forestry Research.
Research topics
- Economic growth
- Engineering
- Economics
- Natural resource economics
- Mechanical engineering
Selected publications
Energy Research & Social Science · 2026-02-26
articleSenior authorUnlocking financial inclusion through solar technology adoption in Malawi
Energy Economics · 2026-01-10 · 2 citations
articleOpen accessSenior authorFinancial inclusion and energy access are development priorities in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), particularly in rural areas. Many households in SSA struggle to attain access to financial services including mobile money, bank accounts, and informal loans, which allow households to mitigate financial risks by relieving capital constraints and promoting investment and asset accumulation. At the same time, over 600 million people in SSA had no electricity access in 2023. Off-grid solar is considered one of the most cost-effective, feasible, and rapid solutions to provide energy access for rural households. Using data from a 1138-household two-wave quasi-experimental impact evaluation focused on solar technology adoption and impacts in rural Malawi, we explore the association between financial inclusion and solar technology adoption. We hypothesize that adoption of solar technologies catalyzes use of mobile money – a financial inclusion mechanism common throughout SSA. We find that households with solar home systems and standalone solar technologies have 40 and 32 percentage points higher chances to use mobile money, respectively. Through mediation analysis, we confirm that access to reliable phone charging is the main pathway connecting solar adoption and mobile money use. We also observe an approximately two-fold increase in participation in informal savings groups associated with solar adoption, likely through increased access to mobile money, which allows people to easily and securely pool finances. The connection between solar adoption and increased access to two key financial inclusion mechanisms suggests a win-win outcome for policymakers seeking to improve energy access and opportunities for economic growth in rural Africa. • Decentralized home solar technology adoption is associated with financial inclusion. • Solar-enabled at-home mobile phone charging encourages mobile money adoption. • Mobile money use can lead to informal savings group participation in rural Malawi.
UNC Libraries · 2025-04-10
articleOpen accessSenior authorDeforestation and biomass fuel dynamics in Uganda
UNC Libraries · 2025-02-18
articleOpen access1st authorCorrespondingUNC Libraries · 2025-10-09
articleOpen accessEighty‐four percent of sub‐Saharan African households rely on polluting fuels (e.g., wood, charcoal) for cooking, leading to high levels of household air pollution (HAP). While switching to modern fuels/stoves could decrease HAP levels, they are not always available or affordable. Improved biomass cookstoves could provide an intermediate step supporting transitions from traditional biomass to clean burning fuels/stoves. We conducted two stove intervention trials in Lusaka, Zambia using targeted marketing/incentives to motivate participants to use improved biomass stoves, either the Mimi Moto (pellet) or the EcoZoom (charcoal). Before the intervention, 65% of participants exclusively used charcoal, while 27% relied on electricity to some extent for cooking. We measured 24‐hr personal exposure to CO ( n = 747) and PM 2.5 ( n = 90) of primary cooks. We implemented several statistical approaches to estimate the effects of interventions on exposure: household‐specific endline minus baseline exposure, ranksum testing, difference‐in‐differences analyses, and cross‐sectional analyses. We found that switching from traditional charcoal stoves to either intervention stove was not associated with significantly reduced exposures. However, cooks using electric stoves independent of the intervention did have significantly lower CO exposures than those using traditional charcoal, with greater electric stove use corresponding to greater exposure reductions. Variability in exposure was dominated by seasonal, regional, and neighborhood differences rather than household stove/fuel choices. A focus on HAP exposure from cooking in urban settings is unlikely to yield expected exposure reductions. Policy makers should consider pollution reduction policies/interventions that target ambient air quality in tandem with HAP‐mitigating strategies to address air pollution health burden. Plain Language Summary In 2019, almost 7 million deaths worldwide were linked to air pollution. In sub‐Saharan Africa, 84% of households use polluting fuels like wood and charcoal for cooking, which leads to high levels of air pollution. While cleaner energy options such as electricity could reduce pollution, they are often not accessible or affordable. Improved biomass cookstoves might offer an intermediate solution, helping people transition from traditional fuels to cleaner options. We conducted two studies in Lusaka, Zambia to encourage traditional stove users to switch to improved biomass stoves, either the Mimi Moto (using wood pellets) or EcoZoom (using charcoal). We measured exposure to carbon monoxide and particulate matter among household cooks. We found that switching to improved stoves did not significantly reduce exposures compared to traditional charcoal use. However, cooks using electric stoves did have lower exposures, with greater exposure reductions as more meals were cooked with electricity. Factors such as season and neighborhood also had substantial impacts on exposure. This suggests that focusing only on reducing pollution from cooking in urban areas may not be enough to improve health. Policymakers should consider broader strategies that also target outdoor air quality to effectively address the health risks of air pollution. Key Points In two interventions, the use of improved biomass stoves was not associated with reduced personal exposures Household cooks using existing electric stoves did have significantly lower exposures than traditional charcoal users Changes in exposure were dominated by seasonal, regional, and neighborhood differences rather than household stove/fuel choices
Energy Research & Social Science · 2025-08-12 · 5 citations
articleOpen accessSenior authorCorrespondingMalawi has one of the lowest rates of electricity access globally, particularly in rural areas where just 5.6 % of households have electricity access. Like many African countries, Malawi is working towards universal electricity access by promoting decentralized solar technologies. We analyze data from a two-wave quasi-experimental quantitative impact evaluation involving 1371 households in rural Malawi to characterize solar technologies and their capacity, explore determinants of adoption of solar home systems and standalone solar panels, and characterize the dynamics of adoption and dis-adoption. We observe a 4.5 percentage point increase in solar ownership over the 12-month study period, with 33.7 % of households owning a solar device by 2023. However, solar device capacity is low (median capacity of 6 W), limiting use to mobile phone charging and limited lighting services. Socioeconomic status and financial inclusion are important factors influencing solar adoption. Wealthier households are 2.5 times more likely to adopt solar home systems and 1.8 times more likely to adopt standalone solar panels. Between 2022 and 2023, 10.8 % of solar-owning households adopted additional solar devices, with wealthier households 30 % more likely to adopt additional devices. In contrast, 28.6 % of solar-owners dis-adopted. Our results highlight challenges for achieving universal energy access through household solar technologies. Low energy capacity suggests limited potential to provide high quality energy services. We recommend a more explicit focus on device capacity in measuring energy access, and targeted financial support and incentives to enhance the adoption, scale up, and long-term use of solar technologies.
Tenure and Forest Income: Observations from a Global Study on Forests and Poverty
UNC Libraries · 2025-10-25
articleOpen accessUNC Libraries · 2025-02-18
articleOpen accessGeoHealth · 2025-09-01 · 1 citations
articleOpen accessAbstract Eighty‐four percent of sub‐Saharan African households rely on polluting fuels (e.g., wood, charcoal) for cooking, leading to high levels of household air pollution (HAP). While switching to modern fuels/stoves could decrease HAP levels, they are not always available or affordable. Improved biomass cookstoves could provide an intermediate step supporting transitions from traditional biomass to clean burning fuels/stoves. We conducted two stove intervention trials in Lusaka, Zambia using targeted marketing/incentives to motivate participants to use improved biomass stoves, either the Mimi Moto (pellet) or the EcoZoom (charcoal). Before the intervention, 65% of participants exclusively used charcoal, while 27% relied on electricity to some extent for cooking. We measured 24‐hr personal exposure to CO ( n = 747) and PM 2.5 ( n = 90) of primary cooks. We implemented several statistical approaches to estimate the effects of interventions on exposure: household‐specific endline minus baseline exposure, ranksum testing, difference‐in‐differences analyses, and cross‐sectional analyses. We found that switching from traditional charcoal stoves to either intervention stove was not associated with significantly reduced exposures. However, cooks using electric stoves independent of the intervention did have significantly lower CO exposures than those using traditional charcoal, with greater electric stove use corresponding to greater exposure reductions. Variability in exposure was dominated by seasonal, regional, and neighborhood differences rather than household stove/fuel choices. A focus on HAP exposure from cooking in urban settings is unlikely to yield expected exposure reductions. Policy makers should consider pollution reduction policies/interventions that target ambient air quality in tandem with HAP‐mitigating strategies to address air pollution health burden.
Money matters: Does access to financial services foster household energy transitions in Africa?
Energy Research & Social Science · 2025-08-01 · 1 citations
articleOpen accessSenior author
Recent grants
Population, land use & health dynamics; Biomass fuel use in sub-Saharan Africa
NIH · $829k · 2012–2018
Evaluating the Welfare and Forest Cover Impacts of Uganda's Forest Sector Governance Reform
NSF · $25k · 2012–2014
NSF · $4.8M · 2018–2025
Frequent coauthors
- 21 shared
John Pender
Economic Research Service
- 16 shared
Erin O. Sills
- 15 shared
D. Sserunkuuma
Makerere University
- 12 shared
Ephraim Nkonya
International Food Policy Research Institute
- 11 shared
Gerald Shively
Purdue University West Lafayette
- 11 shared
William D. Sunderlin
Center for International Forestry Research
- 11 shared
Kathleen Lawlor
- 10 shared
Ida Aju Pradnja Resosudarmo
Australian National University
Labs
FUEL LabPI
Education
Ph.D., SPEA
Indiana University
M.Sc., Rural Economy
University of Alberta
- Resume-aware match score
- Save to shortlist
- AI-drafted outreach
See your match with Pamela Jagger
PhdFit ranks faculty by your research interests, methods, and publications — grounded in their actual work, not templates.
- Free to start
- No credit card
- 30-second signup