
Rebecca Hinze-Pifer
· Assistant ProfessorVerifiedUniversity of Illinois Urbana-Champaign · Education Policy, Organization & Leadership
Active 2010–2026
Research topics
- Computer Science
- Political Science
- Psychology
- Sociology
- Medicine
- Operating system
- Pedagogy
- Mathematics education
- Public relations
- Medical education
Selected publications
Early Childhood Research Quarterly · 2026-01-01
articleRemoving Police From Chicago Schools: A Difference-in-Difference Analysis
2025-01-01
article1st authorCorrespondingEarly Childhood Research Quarterly · 2025-09-17
articleAnalyzing High School CS Teachers' Likelihood of Attrition
2025-07-31
articleOpen accessSenior authorWho Belongs in Mainstream Schools: Alternative School Transfer, Push-Out, and Student Reengagement
Proceedings of the 2019 AERA Annual Meeting · 2024
1st authorCorresponding- Computer Science
- Mathematics education
- Political Science
Determining Who Is Worthy: Stakeholder Perspectives on a District’s De-Leveling Initiatives
Teachers College Record The Voice of Scholarship in Education · 2023 · 1 citations
- Sociology
- Political Science
- Public relations
Background/Context: Scholars and practitioners continue to work to identify ways to change structural conditions, school-level policy, and stakeholder mindsets to support minoritized youth in advanced coursework. Open access policies, in which students do not need a previous teacher’s approval or a prerequisite grade to enroll in an advanced offering, that are coupled with teacher training and student support are one positive direction. However, it is critical to consider whether open access policies are truly “open” and how students are placed in different levels of coursework. Purpose/Objective/Research Question or Focus of Study: The purpose of this article is to examine how key stakeholders, including students, counselors, and principals, understand and act on district initiatives in course placement decisions. Research questions are: (1) How do different stakeholders view their own role, and other stakeholders’ role, in determining who should be enrolled in more advanced coursework? (2) In what ways do different stakeholders understand educational equity in relation to the course placement process? (3) How are students’ reported experiences with course scheduling consistent with or in conflict with the practices and values reported by school administrators and counselors? Research Design: The district at the heart of this study was chosen because of its 10-year-long commitment to reducing barriers to advanced coursework, and implementation of many of the strategies identified as promising by prior research. We utilized a concurrent mixed-methods design involving interviews with principals and counselors and surveys of students, given that both quantitative and qualitative data provide partial perspectives on our research questions. Social reproduction theory served as an explanatory tool, as we considered how different stakeholders understood the idea of “choice” in students’ course-selection process. We looked specifically to ways that the district continues to classify students and contributes to the reproduction of ideas about who is “smart” and “worthy,” and who is not. Conclusions/Recommendations: To address the identified difficulties in reversing race- and class-based inequities in student course-taking, we outlined a set of comprehensive recommendations for policy and practice, at both the school and district level, and the teacher and leader preparation level. In part, these aim to address the variation that existed across the district, in terms of both mindset and policy implementation. Of note, technical solutions are not sufficient for equity-focused reforms, especially with socially constructed concepts such as “interest” and socially constrained pathways of “choice.”
Proceedings of the 2022 AERA Annual Meeting · 2022-01-01
article1st authorCorrespondingObserved Teaching Strategies and Teacher Performance Measurement
Proceedings of the 2019 AERA Annual Meeting · 2020
1st authorCorresponding- Computer Science
- Computer Science
A Decade of Growth in Academic Achievement Gaps: Common Core, Segregation, or Other Factors?
2019 APPAM Fall Research Conference · 2019-11-07
article1st authorCorrespondingThe Implications of Community Violence Exposure for Schools
2019 APPAM Fall Research Conference · 2019-11-07
article1st authorCorresponding
Frequent coauthors
- 3 shared
Lauren Sartain
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
- 1 shared
Rakesh Kochhar
Paras Hospitals
- 1 shared
Amanda J. Moreno
Erikson Institute
- 1 shared
Faith Thompson
Salisbury University
- 1 shared
K. Varey
Erikson Institute
- 1 shared
M. Nathan Tanner
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
- 1 shared
Sean F. Reardon
Stanford University
- 1 shared
Danté Studamire
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
Education
- 2017
Ph.D., Public Policy
University of Chicago
- Resume-aware match score
- Save to shortlist
- AI-drafted outreach
See your match with Rebecca Hinze-Pifer
PhdFit ranks faculty by your research interests, methods, and publications — grounded in their actual work, not templates.
- Free to start
- No credit card
- 30-second signup