Resume-aware faculty matching

Find professors who actually fit you

Upload your resume. Four AI agents analyze your background, rank the faculty who fit, inspect their recent research, and help you draft outreach — grounded in their actual work, not templates.

Free to startNo credit cardCancel anytime
Top matches Balanced preset
Dr. Sarah Chen
Stanford · Interpretability · NLP
91
Dr. Marcus Holloway
MIT · Robotics · RL
84
Dr. Aisha Okonkwo
CMU · Fairness · HCI
82
Nova · Professor Researcher · re-ranking top 20…
Rick Luettich

Rick Luettich

· Alumni Distinguished Professor

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · Geology

Active 1994–2021

h-index20
Citations1.9k
Papers581 last 5y
Funding$167k
See your match with Rick Luettich — sign in to PhdFit.Sign in

About

Rick Luettich is an Alumni Distinguished Professor at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, specializing in Coastal hazards and Coastal Physical Oceanography. He earned his Sc.D. from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in 1987. His research interests include coastal hazard prediction, compound flooding, coastal water level prediction, and climate impacts on coastal hazards. He is actively involved in the Earth, Marine and Environmental Sciences department, contributing to research and education in these areas.

Research topics

  • Computer Science
  • Environmental science
  • Climatology
  • Geography
  • Geology
  • Meteorology

Selected publications

  • Implications from the comparisons between two- and three-dimensional model simulations of the Hurricane Ike storm surge: Hurricane IKE 2-D and 3-D Simulations

    UNC Libraries · 2021-10-30

    articleOpen access

    We apply the Finite Volume Coastal Ocean Model to simulate the Hurricane Ike storm surge using two‐dimensional (2‐D) and three‐dimensional (3‐D) formulations. The high resolution, unstructured grid extends over the Gulf of Mexico with open boundaries in the Straits of Florida and the Yucatan Channel. With the same wind and pressure forcing, the bottom drag coefficients for the baseline 2‐D and 3‐D simulations are determined by spatially varying Manning coefficients and constant bottom roughness, respectively. The baseline 2‐D model simulates both the forerunner and the surge, whereas the baseline 3‐D model simulates the surge, but underestimates the forerunner. Increasing the minimum Manning coefficient reduces the 2‐D forerunner and the surge. Manning coefficient and bottom roughness parameterizations produce different bottom drag coefficients. Using the same bottom drag coefficient, the 2‐D simulation yields a smaller surge than in three dimensions. This is investigated for scenarios of either constant or variable bottom roughness where the bottom roughness is determined through Manning coefficient transformation. These sensitivity studies indicate that storm surges, simulated either in two dimensions or three dimensions, depend critically upon the parameterizations and the parameter values used for specifying bottom stress (and similar may be said of surface stress). Given suitable calibration, 2‐D and 3‐D models may adequately simulate storm surge. However, it is unclear that a calibration for a given storm and location may apply generally. Hence additional experimental guidance is required on the parameterizations and the parameter values used for both the surface and bottom stresses under severe wind conditions.

  • North Carolina State climate report

    2020

    • Computer Science
    • Climatology
    • Environmental science
  • Developing a Coastal and Inland Hazard and Impact Prediction System for Extreme Weather Events in the Northeastern United States

    AGUFM · 2018-12-01

    articleSenior author
  • Downscaling of Real-Time Coastal Flooding Predictions for Decision Support

    AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts · 2018-12-01

    articleSenior author
  • Coastal Hazards Related to Storm Surge

    2018-03-13 · 1 citations

    bookOpen access1st authorCorresponding

    Globally, the risk associated with living in the coastal zone is substantial and rising due to large and growing populations, commerce and infrastructure; relative sea level rise; and the impacts of a warming climate on storm characteristics. The principal coastal hazards in much of the world are storm surge, coastal flooding and surface waves caused by severe tropical or extra-tropical storms. This volume presents state of the art research that extends our understanding of, and our ability to predict coastal hazards that are associated with storm surge. Fourteen papers cover topics ranging from predicting coupled surge and wave dynamics at multiple scales; erosion and scour; statistical considerations for hazard delineation; joint effects of climate change and storm surge; storm surge mitigation strategies and human response to storm surge threats. This work presents important advancements in our ability to predict, mitigate and respond to the principal hazard threatening most of the world's coastal areas. Recognizing these advancements and translating them into policy and practice are essential if we are to effectively manage coastal risk and create more resilient coastal communities in which to live, work and recreate.

  • Representing Low Frequency, Spatially Varying Water Level Anomalies in Storm Surge Computations

    97th American Meteorological Society Annual Meeting · 2017-01-24

    article1st authorCorresponding
  • Sensitivity of Storm Surge Predictions to Atmospheric Forcing during Hurricane Isaac

    Journal of Waterway Port Coastal and Ocean Engineering · 2017-10-12 · 65 citations

    articleSenior author

    Storm surge and overland flooding can be predicted with computational models at high levels of resolution. To improve efficiency in forecasting applications, surge models often use atmospheric forcing from parametric vortex models, which represent the surface pressures and wind fields with a few storm parameters. The future of storm surge prediction could involve real-time coupling of surge and full-physics atmospheric models; thus, their accuracies must be understood in a real hurricane scenario. The authors compare predictions from a parametric vortex model (using forecast tracks from the National Hurricane Center) and a full-physics coupled atmosphere-wave-ocean model during Hurricane Isaac (2012). The predictions are then applied within a tightly coupled, wave and surge modeling system describing the northern Gulf of Mexico and the floodplains of southwest Louisiana. It is shown that, in a hindcast scenario, a parametric vortex model can outperform a data-assimilated wind product, and given reasonable forecast advisories, a parametric vortex model gives reasonable surge forecasts. However, forecasts using a full-physics coupled model outperformed the forecast advisories and improved surge forecasts. Both approaches are valuable for forecasting the coastal impacts associated with tropical cyclones.

  • Reducing Coastal Risk – Structural Protection around Greater New Orleans

    ODU Digital Commons (Old Dominion University) · 2015-01-01

    articleOpen access1st authorCorresponding
  • The Importance of Federal and Regional Partnerships in Coastal Observing

    Elsevier eBooks · 2015-01-01 · 2 citations

    book-chapter
  • Contributors

    Elsevier eBooks · 2015-01-01

    book-chapter

Recent grants

Frequent coauthors

Labs

  • Resume-aware match score
  • Save to shortlist
  • AI-drafted outreach

See your match with Rick Luettich

PhdFit ranks faculty by your research interests, methods, and publications — grounded in their actual work, not templates.

  • Free to start
  • No credit card
  • 30-second signup