Shamya Karumbaiah
· Assistant Professor, Learning Sciences AreaVerifiedUniversity of Wisconsin-Madison · Educational Psychology
Active 2016–2025
About
Shamya Karumbaiah is an assistant professor in Educational Psychology at the University of Wisconsin-Madison. She completed her PhD at the University of Pennsylvania in 2021, where she worked as a research fellow in the Penn Center for Learning Analytics with Dr. Ryan Baker. Following her PhD, she was a postdoctoral fellow at Carnegie Mellon University in the Human-Computer Interaction Institute, collaborating with Dr. Vincent Aleven and Dr. Nikol Rummel. Her research focuses on promoting student engagement and learning within adaptive and artificially intelligent educational systems, emphasizing fairness and equity. Her work lies at the intersection of machine learning and learning sciences, involving the development of statistical and machine learning models to understand complex educational constructs such as affect, cognition, motivation, self-identity, help-seeking, and persistence. She also pursues methodological innovations in learning analytics to address challenges in applying current methods to education data, with a critical focus on identifying and mitigating biases to ensure equitable student outcomes. Prior to her doctoral studies, she earned an MS in computer science from UMass Amherst with an emphasis on machine learning, working with Dr. Beverly P. Woolf and Dr. Ivon Arroyo. In 2016, she was a visiting researcher in learning sciences at USC ICT, collaborating with Dr. Benjamin Nye and Dr. Mark Core. She also interned as a data scientist at Cisco's Advanced Technologies and AI lab in 2017 and worked as a software engineer at Cisco from 2011 to 2015 after earning a BE in Computer Science from SJCE India.
Research topics
- Computer Science
- Sociology
- Engineering
- Computer Security
- Artificial Intelligence
- Psychology
- Epistemology
- World Wide Web
- Social psychology
- Engineering ethics
- Internet privacy
- Mathematics education
- Economics
- Data science
Selected publications
Lecture notes in computer science · 2025-01-01
book-chapterSenior authorA Comparative Analysis of LLM and Specialized NLP System for Automated Assessment of Science Content
Lecture notes in computer science · 2025-01-01
book-chapterResponsible AI in Education: Understanding Teachers’ Priorities and Contextual Challenges
2025-06-23 · 2 citations
articleOpen accessPrompt vs. Supervise: A Case of Using Language Models to Assess Students’ Science Explanations
Lecture notes in computer science · 2025-09-01
book-chapter1st authorCorresponding2025-02-21 · 1 citations
articleOpen accessLecture notes in computer science · 2025-01-01
book-chapter1st authorCorrespondingExploring Out-of-Tutor Interventions by Teachers in Supporting Student Learning with AI Tutors
Proceedings. · 2025-06-10
articleOpen access1st authorCorrespondingLearning analytics has embraced the complexities of modeling student learning and engagement in ecological settings like K12 classrooms.While analyzing AI tutor interaction logs remains common, there is a growing need to include events that happen outside the AI tutor.Studies indicate teachers play active roles when students use AI tutors, and teacher support tools improve learning outcomes.However, methodological challenges exist in studying how such out-of-tutor interventions in the classroom shape learning (e.g., no counterfactual data, ethical issues in collecting control data).We propose a simple reconceptualization of the problem with which we could use standard statistical approaches to quantify the relationship between out-of-tutor interventions and student learning in the AI tutor.We study how moments of teacher help relate to improvements in students' performance on the skill or concept they were helped with.Our analysis reveals that teacher help has a significantly positive effect.
Teacher Perceptions on AI Support for Bi/multilingual Learners: Superpowers and Constraints
Lecture notes in computer science · 2025-01-01
book-chapterLecture notes in computer science · 2025-09-02
book-chapterProceedings. · 2025-06-10
articleOpen accessThis paper investigates teachers' perceptions on linguistic variations in bi/multilingual learners' (MLs) writing to evaluate the (in)effectiveness of Multilingual Large Language Models (MLLMs), which are artificial intelligence (AI) models that generate texts in multiple languages.Due to their inherent linguistic biases, these models often struggle to interpret MLs' linguistic variations.To address this gap, we elicit teacher feedback on prevalent linguistic variations in MLs' writing and assess how Meta Llama 3.1, a state-of-the-art MLLM, responds to these variations.Using translanguaging as a lens-the fluid use of multiple languages to convey meaning across social contexts-we propose a new approach to evaluate MLLMs in multilingual learning contexts.With the increasing prevalence of AI in K12 classrooms, this paper advocates for the inclusion of bi/multilingual educators to better align the use of AI with progressive pedagogies such as translanguaging.
Frequent coauthors
- 44 shared
Ryan S. Baker
- 29 shared
Jaclyn Ocumpaugh
University of Pennsylvania
- 12 shared
Scott A. Crossley
Vanderbilt University
- 11 shared
Matthew J. Labrum
- 9 shared
Mark G. Core
Creative Technologies (United States)
- 9 shared
Kallirroi Georgila
- 9 shared
Benjamin D. Nye
Creative Technologies (United States)
- 9 shared
Daniel Auerbach
Maersk (Denmark)
Labs
Promoting student engagement and learning in adaptive and artificially intelligent educational systems in a fair and equitable manner.
Awards & honors
- Nellie McKay Fellowship, University of Wisconsin–Madison, 20…
- Best Paper Nomination (as first author), ACM LAK, 2021
- Rising Stars in EECS, Massachusetts Institute of Technology,…
- Best Paper Nomination (as first author), ICQE, 2020
- Best Paper Nomination (as first author), EDM, 2018
- Resume-aware match score
- Save to shortlist
- AI-drafted outreach
See your match with Shamya Karumbaiah
PhdFit ranks faculty by your research interests, methods, and publications — grounded in their actual work, not templates.
- Free to start
- No credit card
- 30-second signup