Resume-aware faculty matching

Find professors who actually fit you

Upload your resume. Four AI agents analyze your background, rank the faculty who fit, inspect their recent research, and help you draft outreach — grounded in their actual work, not templates.

Free to startNo credit cardCancel anytime
Top matches Balanced preset
Dr. Sarah Chen
Stanford · Interpretability · NLP
91
Dr. Marcus Holloway
MIT · Robotics · RL
84
Dr. Aisha Okonkwo
CMU · Fairness · HCI
82
Nova · Professor Researcher · re-ranking top 20…
Suzanna Linn

Suzanna Linn

Verified

Pennsylvania State University · Social Data Analytics

Active 1992–2023

h-index9
Citations350
Papers8468 last 5y
Funding
See your match with Suzanna Linn — sign in to PhdFit.Sign in

About

Suzanna Linn is a Professor of Political Science and a Graduate Faculty member at Pennsylvania State University. She is also a Social Data Analytics C-SoDA Faculty Affiliate. Her research focuses on social data analytics within the context of political science, contributing to the understanding of social data through her academic work. She is affiliated with the Department of Political Science and the Social Data Analytics program, working at the 302 Pond Laboratory in University Park, PA. Her professional profile can be found on the university's website, and she is connected through her email sld8@psu.edu.

Research topics

  • Computer science
  • Information retrieval
  • Environmental science
  • Natural language processing
  • Mathematics

Selected publications

  • The Exogeneity Question(s)

    Oxford University Press eBooks · 2023-12-18

    book-chapter1st authorCorresponding

    Abstract Exogeneity assumptions are critical to applied time series analysis, but the topic is under-discussed and under-explained in econometric texts and often assumed away in applied work. The central misunderstanding is that there is not an exogeneity assumption; there are many exogeneity assumptions. Weak exogeneity, strong exogeneity, and super exogeneity are more or less likely to hold in different applications and the type of exogeneity that can be assumed tells us what we can learn from a given model. This chapter explains the importance of exogeneity in applied time series analysis, defines the different exogeneity concepts, highlights the different forms of time series analysis they are relevant for, and provides a strategy for evaluating the different exogeneity assumptions. Theory and data must support the exogeneity assumption necessary given the purpose of an analysis and analysts must be transparent in the claims they make about exogeneity.

  • The Distinctness of Social and Economic Identities

    SSRN Electronic Journal · 2022-01-01

    articleOpen accessSenior author
  • PPS volume 19 issue 3 Cover and Front matter

    Perspectives on Politics · 2021-09-01

    articleOpen access

    Founded in 1903, the American Political Science Association (APSA) is the leading professional organization for the study of political science and serves more than 11,000 members in over 100 countries. With a range of programs and services for individuals, departments, and institutions, APSA brings together political scientists from all fields of inquiry, regions, and occupational endeavors within and outside academe in order to deepen our understanding of politics, democracy, and citizenship throughout the world. The direct advancement of knowledge is at the core of APSA activities. We promote scholarly communication in political science through a variety of initiatives including publishing four distinguished

  • figure7-appendix.tab

    Harvard Dataverse · 2020-01-01

    datasetOpen access
  • sentence_article_feature_space.py

    Harvard Dataverse · 2020-01-01

    datasetOpen access
  • LICENSE

    Harvard Dataverse · 2020-01-01

    datasetOpen access
  • 10-binning-analysis.R

    Harvard Dataverse · 2020-01-01

    datasetOpen access
  • Beyond the Unit Root Question: Uncertainty and Inference

    American Journal of Political Science · 2020-02-09 · 26 citations

    article

    Abstract A fundamental challenge facing applied time‐series analysts is how to draw inferences about long‐run relationships (LRR) when we are uncertain whether the data contain unit roots. Unit root tests are notoriously unreliable and often leave analysts uncertain, but popular extant methods hinge on correct classification. Webb, Linn, and Lebo (WLL; 2019) develop a framework for inference based on critical value bounds for hypothesis tests on the long‐run multiplier (LRM) that eschews unit root tests and incorporates the uncertainty inherent in identifying the dynamic properties of the data into inferences about LRRs. We show how the WLL bounds procedure can be applied to any fully specified regression model to solve this fundamental challenge, extend the results of WLL by presenting a general set of critical value bounds to be used in applied work, and demonstrate the empirical relevance of the LRM bounds procedure in two applications.

  • appendix-table3.html

    Harvard Dataverse · 2020-01-01

    datasetOpen access
  • data-1AC.tab

    Harvard Dataverse · 2020-01-01

    datasetOpen access

Frequent coauthors

  • Janet M. Box‐Steffensmeier

    The Ohio State University

    3618 shared
  • Erik Bleich

    Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg

    3607 shared
  • Ben W. Ansell

    University of Oxford

    3606 shared
  • Catherine Guisan

    University of Minnesota

    3605 shared
  • Alexandra Filindra

    3604 shared
  • Tamara Metz

    Reed College

    3604 shared
  • John Ishiyama

    University of North Texas

    3603 shared
  • David Lublin

    American University

    3602 shared

Labs

  • Social Data AnalyticsPI

  • Resume-aware match score
  • Save to shortlist
  • AI-drafted outreach

See your match with Suzanna Linn

PhdFit ranks faculty by your research interests, methods, and publications — grounded in their actual work, not templates.

  • Free to start
  • No credit card
  • 30-second signup